vivo V30 vs Honor X9b: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V30 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset delivers noticeably better performance, and the 80W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Honor X9b offers a competitive price, the V30’s superior processing power and faster charging justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 | Honor X9b |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 04 | 2023, October 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 04 | Available. Released 2023, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Alpha | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4 (market/region dependent) | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 48 min Reverse wired | 35W wired Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black | Sunrise Orange, Midnight Black, Emerald Green |
| Models | V2318 | ALI-NX1 |
| Price | About 690 EUR | About 970 EUR |
vivo V30
- Faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset for superior performance
- 80W fast charging for quick power-ups
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- Likely higher price point compared to the Honor X9b
- No information on storage options
Honor X9b
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging for topping up accessories
- Slower Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset limits gaming and multitasking
- 35W charging is significantly slower than the V30
Display Comparison
While both devices likely employ AMOLED panels (data not provided), the vivo V30 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in direct sunlight compared to what is typical for the Honor X9b’s segment. The absence of refresh rate data for the X9b implies a standard 60Hz panel, while the V30 is likely to offer a smoother experience with a higher refresh rate. This brightness advantage benefits users who frequently consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference suggests the V30 will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 supports more advanced camera features, such as 4K HDR video recording, which may not be available on the X9b. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the V30’s processing power will likely result in more detailed and vibrant images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo V30 utilizes the Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), while the Honor X9b features the SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 – is architecturally superior to the X9b’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. The 7 Gen 3’s more modern core design and higher clock speeds provide a tangible advantage for demanding tasks. The 4nm process node in both chips ensures reasonable thermal efficiency, but the 7 Gen 3’s more advanced architecture will likely result in better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
The vivo V30 achieves a full charge in just 48 minutes with its 80W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Honor X9b’s 35W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the V30’s active use score of 15:01h demonstrates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed is a crucial benefit for users who need to quickly top up their device. The X9b’s slower charging will require a longer commitment to the wall, even if its battery capacity is comparable.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 if you prioritize smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and quick charging – ideal for power users and those constantly on the go. Buy the Honor X9b if you’re on a tighter budget and primarily need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light media consumption. The X9b represents excellent value for those less concerned with peak performance.