vivo V30 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a consistently excellent camera experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the stronger choice. However, the vivo V30 excels for those who value incredibly fast charging and a brighter, more visually striking display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 04 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 04 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Alpha | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4 (market/region dependent) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 48 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2318 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 690 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
vivo V30
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- Significantly brighter display (1253 nits)
- Modern Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Camera performance is largely unknown
- Limited information on display technology beyond brightness
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera performance and image processing
- Smooth and optimized Google software experience
- Reliable and consistent performance
- Slow 18W wired charging
- Lower peak display brightness (1070 nits)
Display Comparison
The vivo V30’s display boasts a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, significantly outshining the Pixel 7a’s 1070 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED panels, the V30’s higher brightness and potentially wider color gamut (though not specified) offer a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve battery, but the V30’s brighter panel may offset some of those gains.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a known quantity, renowned for its computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details are missing for both phones, the Pixel 7a’s strength lies in its image processing algorithms, delivering consistently excellent photos and videos. The V30’s camera capabilities are less documented, making a direct comparison difficult. However, the Pixel 7a’s focus on software-driven image quality gives it a significant advantage, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs for the V30 makes it hard to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range.
Performance
The chipset battle pits Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) against Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2 features higher clock speeds on its prime cores (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 vs 1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715), the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 benefits from a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process. This suggests better power efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Pixel 7a’s CPU configuration includes older Cortex-A78 cores, while the V30 utilizes the newer Cortex-A715, further bolstering its performance advantage. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization, but the V30 appears to have a hardware edge.
Battery Life
The vivo V30’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 48 minutes. This is dramatically faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging, which will take considerably longer. While the Pixel 7a boasts an 'Endurance rating' of 76 hours, this is a subjective metric. The V30’s active use score of 15:01h provides a more concrete measure of real-world battery performance. The V30’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery capacity, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Pixel 7a’s 7.5W wireless charging is a convenience feature, but significantly slower than its wired counterpart.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 if you need a phone that can rapidly replenish its battery – its 80W charging is a game-changer for power users. Also, choose the V30 if display brightness and vividness are paramount. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize a smooth, Google-first software experience, exceptional camera performance, and a phone that consistently delivers reliable results in various lighting conditions.