Oppo Find X7 vs Vivo V30 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find X7 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 9300 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift, coupled with significantly faster 100W charging that reaches 100% in just 26 minutes. While the V30 Pro offers respectable battery life, the Find X7’s raw power and charging speed justify the potential price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 Pro | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 28 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 07 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott α), glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott α glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 43 min Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | V2319 | PHZ110 |
| Price | About 450 EUR | About 520 EUR |
vivo V30 Pro
- Excellent battery life (13:25h active use)
- Bright 1197 nit display
- Potentially more affordable price
- Older Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Slower 80W charging (43 min to full)
Oppo Find X7
- Cutting-edge Dimensity 9300 chipset
- Ultra-fast 100W charging (26 min to full)
- Potentially superior camera processing
- Display specs currently unknown
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but the display experience differs. The Vivo V30 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1197 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While panel technology isn't specified, the brightness suggests a high-quality AMOLED. The Oppo Find X7’s display specs are currently unavailable, but given Oppo’s history with flagship devices, we anticipate a comparable or superior AMOLED panel, potentially with LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates and improved power efficiency. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones makes a direct comparison difficult, but the V30 Pro’s brightness provides a solid baseline.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond sensor resolution are missing for both devices. However, the chipset plays a role. The Dimensity 9300 in the Find X7 includes an upgraded ISP (Image Signal Processor) capable of handling more complex image processing tasks, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. While both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, the Find X7’s superior processing power suggests a more refined camera experience. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Find X7’s chipset gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X7 is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 9300, featuring a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-X4 prime cores clocked at 3.25 GHz. This is a significant step up from the Vivo V30 Pro’s Dimensity 8200, which uses Cortex-A78 cores peaking at 3.1 GHz. The X4 cores in the 9300 offer substantially improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Find X7’s CPU architecture (3x X4 vs 3x A78) translates to a more powerful and efficient processing experience, particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and high-end gaming. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 9300 give the Find X7 a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Vivo V30 Pro achieves 13 hours and 25 minutes of active use, a respectable result. However, the Oppo Find X7 compensates for any potential battery capacity difference with its significantly faster 100W charging. Reaching 50% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 26 minutes is a game-changer for users who prioritize convenience. The V30 Pro’s 80W charging, while fast, takes 43 minutes to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Find X7, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Vivo V30 Pro if you prioritize a balanced experience with good battery life (13:25h active use) and a bright, vibrant display, all at a potentially lower price point. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 100W charging, even if it means a slightly higher investment.