Poco X6 Pro vs. vivo V30 Lite: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly faster performance, and the 67W charging is a substantial upgrade over the V30 Lite’s 44W. While the V30 Lite offers 5G at a lower price, the X6 Pro’s overall experience justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 Lite | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 29 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Black, Rose Gold | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | V2314 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 480 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo V30 Lite
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Sleek and lightweight design (assumed)
- Potentially longer software support (vivo's track record)
- Underpowered Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely inferior display quality
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Fast 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Bright and vibrant display (1148 nits)
- Potentially higher price point
- Larger size and weight (likely)
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the V30 Lite (brightness data unavailable, but typically lower in this price bracket). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Xiaomi’s display track record) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature cameras, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable imaging experience. The V30 Lite’s camera specifications are not detailed, but typically phones in this segment prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and image processing. The X6 Pro, while details are limited, benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, enabling more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, but the X6 Pro’s superior chipset should provide better results. We'd expect the X6 Pro to excel in low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is in a different league than the vivo V30 Lite’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core, provides a significant boost in CPU and GPU performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 695 is less efficient than the 4nm Dimensity, potentially leading to more heat generation under sustained load. The X6 Pro is the clear winner for power users and gamers.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the V30 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes. This is significantly faster than the V30 Lite’s 44W charging. The combination of efficient chipset and fast charging makes the X6 Pro the more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 Lite if you prioritize 5G connectivity on a strict budget and don't require demanding performance for gaming or intensive tasks. It's a solid option for everyday use and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you value performance, fast charging, and a brighter display, and are willing to spend a bit more for a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for gaming and content creation.