vivo V30 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and sustained performance, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the stronger choice. Its Exynos 1480 chipset and 1010 nit display offer a noticeable upgrade over the vivo V30 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 and less-bright panel, justifying the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 29 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Black, Rose Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | V2314 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo V30 Lite
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Potentially shorter battery life
Samsung Galaxy A55
- More powerful Exynos 1480 chipset
- Brighter and higher-quality display (1010 nits)
- Longer battery life (13:27h active use)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Higher price compared to the V30 Lite
- May lack headphone jack (market dependent)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to the vivo V30 Lite’s unspecified brightness. This translates to superior visibility outdoors and a more engaging viewing experience. While the V30 Lite’s panel technology isn’t detailed, Samsung’s likely utilizes Super AMOLED, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A55’s higher peak brightness is particularly beneficial for HDR content consumption, something the V30 Lite will likely struggle with. Bezels are expected to be similar, but the A55’s overall display quality is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the V30 Lite, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and sensor quality in its A-series. The A55 likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image stabilization (OIS) than the V30 Lite. While both phones may include a variety of lenses, the focus should be on the primary sensor’s capabilities. The V30 Lite’s inclusion of a 2MP macro lens is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility, whereas the A55’s camera system is expected to deliver more consistent and higher-quality results across various shooting scenarios.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) is built on a more efficient process node than the vivo V30 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). This 4nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the A55 is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – also represents a performance leap over the V30 Lite’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. While both are octa-core, the A78 cores in the A55 are significantly more powerful. This will be noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13:27 hours of active use. While the V30 Lite’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s performance suggests a larger battery or more efficient power management. The A55’s 25W charging is slower than the V30 Lite’s 44W, but the A55’s superior battery life mitigates this. A full charge on the V30 Lite will be quicker, but the A55 will likely last significantly longer between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 Lite if you need a reliable 5G connection on a tight budget and prioritize affordability above all else. It’s a solid option for basic tasks and casual social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more refined experience with a brighter, more color-accurate display, smoother performance for demanding apps, and longer-lasting battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.