vivo V30 Lite vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a performance edge, and the 68W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the V30 Lite remains a viable option for those deeply embedded in the Qualcomm ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 Lite | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Black, Rose Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2314 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo V30 Lite
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Established software ecosystem
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely less powerful processor
- Limited battery performance data
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- MediaTek chipset may not appeal to all users
- Potentially higher price point
- Software updates may be less frequent
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the V30 Lite, whose display specifications are currently unavailable. While the V30 Lite likely offers a respectable panel, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness provides a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. We expect both devices to utilize OLED panels, common in this price bracket, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for the V30 Lite. However, the Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to be more versatile, focusing on photo and video quality. The absence of detailed specs for the V30 Lite suggests a more basic camera setup. The Edge 40 Neo’s image processing capabilities, combined with potentially larger sensors, will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Edge 40 Neo is expected to deliver more refined results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo V30 Lite utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo features the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a higher clock speed and a more modern CPU architecture than the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to snappier performance in applications and a more capable gaming experience. While both are 6nm chips, the Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 7030 provide a substantial architectural advantage. The V30 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, but the Edge 40 Neo is better equipped for multitasking and demanding games.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This is a significant advantage over the V30 Lite, for which battery performance data is unavailable. Furthermore, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging, capable of delivering 50% charge in just 15 minutes, drastically reduces downtime compared to the V30 Lite’s 44W charging. The Edge 40 Neo’s combination of long battery life and fast charging makes it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 Lite if you prioritize a well-established Qualcomm chipset and a familiar software experience, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value longer battery life, significantly faster charging, and a more modern processor architecture for improved performance in demanding tasks and gaming.