vivo V30 Pro vs V30 Lite (ME): Which vivo Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo V30 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset, coupled with a brighter display and longer battery life, justifies the price premium. However, the V30 Lite remains a strong contender for budget-conscious users prioritizing efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V30 Lite (ME) | vivo V30 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 26 | 2024, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 26 | Available. Released 2024, March 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Schott α), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.8 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 191 g (6.56 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Schott α glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 106° (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 43 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Leather Purple, Leather Orange, Crystal Black | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black |
| Models | - | V2319 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 450 EUR |
vivo V30 Lite (ME)
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Fast 80W charging (to 80%)
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially limited camera capabilities
vivo V30 Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Brighter display (1197 nits)
- Longer battery life (13:25h active use)
- Higher price
- Slightly slower full charge time (43 minutes)
Display Comparison
The vivo V30 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1197 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the V30 Lite, whose brightness is not specified but is expected to be lower given its positioning. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the V30 Pro’s higher peak brightness and potential for higher resolution (not specified, but likely) contribute to a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the V30 Pro, positioned as a more premium device, is likely to feature a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The V30 Lite’s camera system will likely prioritize affordability, potentially sacrificing low-light performance and dynamic range. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also more probable on the V30 Pro, resulting in sharper images and smoother video recording. It's reasonable to assume the V30 Pro will offer a more versatile and capable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo V30 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200, built on a 4nm process, features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the V30 Lite’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (also 4nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to significantly faster application loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the V30 Pro. The Dimensity 8200’s more robust GPU will handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and detail settings. While both use a 4nm process for efficiency, the Dimensity 8200’s architectural advantages provide a clear performance lead.
Battery Life
The vivo V30 Pro demonstrates superior battery performance with an active use score of 13:25h, indicating a larger battery capacity and/or more efficient power management. Both devices support 80W wired charging, but the V30 Pro achieves a full charge in 43 minutes, while the V30 Lite reaches 80% in 30 minutes. This suggests the V30 Pro’s larger battery takes slightly longer to fully replenish, but the overall endurance is significantly better. Both also offer reverse wired charging, adding to their versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V30 Lite (ME) if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize battery life and affordability. Buy the vivo V30 Pro if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps, gaming, and content creation, and value a brighter, more vibrant display and faster charging.