vivo V29 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 FE: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a more established ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE is the better choice. However, the vivo V29 excels in charging speed and offers a compelling alternative for those who value rapid power-ups and a sleek design.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V29 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 31 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September | Available. Released 2023, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.4 x 7.5 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 158 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.22 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - InternationalOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - USA |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - USA |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Xclipse 920 - InternationalAdreno 730 - USA |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 10 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 17 min | 25W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Himalayan Blue, Purple Fairy, Majestic Red | Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine |
| Models | V2250 | SM-S711B, SM-S711B/DS, SM-S711U1, SM-S711U, SM-S711W, SM-S7110, SM-S711N |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 219.95 / C$ 327.90 / £ 248.99 / € 272.00 / ₹ 34,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) | 0.76 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo V29
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially longer battery endurance (based on lab tests)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Limited information on camera sensor specs
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
- More powerful Exynos 2200/Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Samsung’s refined software experience
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling with Exynos variant
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, with the vivo V29 achieving a measured peak brightness of 996 nits and the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE reaching 985 nits. This ensures excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. While both offer vibrant colors, the S23 FE’s panel benefits from Samsung’s display expertise, potentially offering slightly more accurate color calibration. Neither specification details refresh rate, but both are expected to be 120Hz. The V29’s display is likely to be OLED, while the S23 FE uses Dynamic AMOLED 2X, offering a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having strong camera systems, but details are limited to 'Photo / Video' for both. The S23 FE likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. While the V29 may excel in specific scenarios like low-light portraits due to vivo’s software optimizations, the S23 FE’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Exynos/Snapdragon chipset provides greater flexibility and overall image quality. The absence of details regarding sensor sizes and apertures makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the S23 FE’s flagship-level processor suggests superior computational photography capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Samsung Galaxy S23 FE, equipped with either the Exynos 2200 (International) or Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (USA), boasts a considerably more powerful processor than the vivo V29’s Snapdragon 778G 5G. The Exynos 2200’s Cortex-X2 core, clocked at 2.8 GHz, provides a substantial performance uplift over the V29’s Cortex-A78. The 4nm process node on both the Exynos and Snapdragon chips offers improved efficiency compared to the V29’s 6nm Snapdragon 778G, though the Exynos 2200 has been known to exhibit thermal throttling under sustained load. The S23 FE’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not provided, but standard for the price) further enhances multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The vivo V29’s endurance rating of 99 hours suggests excellent battery life, but this is a lab-based metric. The S23 FE’s active use score of 8:28h provides a more realistic indication of real-world performance. The V29’s 80W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving 50% charge in just 17 minutes, significantly faster than the S23 FE’s 25W charging (50% in 30 minutes). The S23 FE compensates with 15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the V29. The faster charging of the V29 is a major advantage for users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V29 if you need blazing-fast 80W charging and prioritize a stylish design. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23 FE if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the broader Samsung ecosystem and software support.