vivo V29 Lite vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a performance edge, and the 68W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the V29 Lite remains a viable option for those deeply embedded in the Qualcomm ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V29 Lite | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, June 02 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 15 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.8 x 7.9 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2244 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo V29 Lite
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Established software ecosystem
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially weaker CPU performance
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 chipset
- MediaTek chipset may have less software optimization
- Camera details are limited
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight, a clear advantage over the V29 Lite (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the display's brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially for media consumption. We expect the V29 Lite to have a standard LCD or AMOLED panel, while the Edge 40 Neo's higher brightness suggests a more advanced AMOLED technology. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for the V29 Lite, but the Edge 40 Neo is expected to deliver a vibrant and immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' are sparse for the Edge 40 Neo, but Motorola typically focuses on computational photography. The V29 Lite's camera specs are also missing. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Edge 40 Neo, if equipped, would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. We can assume both phones will include a standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lens, but the quality will depend heavily on the sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo V29 Lite uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo features the MediaTek Dimensity 7030. The Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a noticeable CPU performance boost over the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the Cortex-A78 architecture is more efficient. The Edge 40 Neo is likely to handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and fewer stutters. RAM configurations are unknown for both, but LPDDR5x support on the Edge 40 Neo would further enhance performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate superior battery life compared to the V29 Lite (battery capacity and endurance data unavailable). Crucially, the Edge 40 Neo supports 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The V29 Lite’s 44W charging is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V29 Lite if you prioritize a well-established chipset with broad compatibility and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. This phone suits users who value a known quantity and aren't heavy multitaskers. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you demand faster charging, longer battery life, and a more modern processor for smoother performance in demanding applications and games. This is the better choice for power users and those who frequently travel.