The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V27e and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior display, more efficient chipset, and significantly faster charging. While the V27e boasts a stylish design and decent performance, the A54’s longevity and features make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.8 x 7.7 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant
| IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glory Black, Lavender Purple, Lively Green | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2237 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V27e
- Fast 66W Charging
- Stylish Design
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Good Selfie Camera
- Slower Processor than A54
- Less Bright Display
- Slower Charging than Competitors
- Less Consistent Camera Performance
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Display (Brightness & Contrast)
- Long Battery Life
- Efficient Chipset (Exynos 1380)
- Reliable Camera Performance
- Samsung's Software Support
- Slower 25W Charging
- Design is more understated
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 980 nits peak brightness ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, while the infinite contrast ratio delivers stunning visuals. The V27e's display is good, but lacks the A54's vibrancy and outdoor usability. Both offer FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54's image processing and overall versatility are slightly better. The A54's camera consistently produces well-balanced photos in various lighting conditions. The V27e's camera is decent, but can sometimes struggle with dynamic range and color accuracy.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54, built on a 5nm process, generally outperforms the Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) in the V27e. The A54's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking. While the V27e is capable for everyday tasks, the A54 offers a smoother, more future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 shines in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h is exceptional, and active use consistently delivers over 11 hours. The V27e's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A54's impressive longevity. The A54's 25W charging is slower than the V27e's 66W, but the longer battery life mitigates this.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V27e? Users prioritizing a stylish design and fast charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a vibrant display and excellent camera capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 benefits from Samsung's commitment to long-term software updates, typically receiving updates for several years.
❓ Is the vivo V27e worth considering if fast charging is a priority?
Yes, the V27e's 66W charging is a significant advantage if you frequently need to top up your battery quickly. However, consider the trade-offs in other areas.
