vivo V27 vs Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and quicker charging. While the V27 boasts a slightly brighter display, the Poco F5's superior performance and value make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V27 | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | V2231, V2246 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 380 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 134h | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- Stylish Design
- Good Color Accuracy (potentially)
- Excellent Battery Endurance (134h)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Slower Charging
- Potentially less dynamic range in camera
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Excellent Value
- Smooth 120Hz Display
- Design less premium than V27
- Slightly lower peak brightness (963 nits)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent OLED displays with infinite contrast ratios. The vivo V27 takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits, offering a marginally brighter viewing experience, especially outdoors. The Poco F5's 963 nits is still very impressive. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering versatile setups. The V27 might have a slight edge in color accuracy in certain lighting conditions, while the Poco F5 could offer better dynamic range. Both likely feature a main sensor around 64MP and ultrawide lens. Low-light performance will likely be similar.
Performance
Here's where the Poco F5 truly shines. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Dimensity 7200. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience on the Poco F5. The V27 is capable, but it can't match the F5's raw power.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 134h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Poco F5's active use score of 11:52h is still respectable. More importantly, the Poco F5 charges significantly faster with 67W wired charging (100% in 46 minutes) compared to the V27's 66W (50% in 19 minutes).
Buying Guide
The vivo V27 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a stylish design. It's a good option if camera quality and a premium feel are key. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is perfect for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance at a competitive price. It's a great value proposition for those seeking speed and efficiency.