vivo V27 vs vivo V25 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the V25 Pro thanks to its significantly brighter display and more powerful chipset. While the V25 Pro offers slightly faster charging, the V27's overall performance and visual experience make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V27 | vivo V25 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color | Color changing back panel color Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2231, V2246 | V2158 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 134h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 704090 (v9) GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V27
- Brighter Display (1055 nits)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 7200)
- Superior Battery Life (134h Endurance)
- Modern Design
- Slightly slower charging (50% in 19 mins)
- Potentially larger size/weight
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster Charging (40% in 15 mins)
- Slightly more compact design (potentially)
- Good Camera System
- Dimmer Display (805 nits)
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Shorter Battery Life (101h Endurance)
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 boasts a significantly brighter display, measuring 1055 nits peak brightness compared to the V25 Pro's 805 nits. Both feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and excellent contrast (both listed as 'Infinite' nominal), but the V27's higher brightness will be noticeable, especially outdoors. Both likely have a 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Based on available information, both likely offer versatile setups with main, ultrawide, and macro lenses. The V27 may have a slight edge in image processing due to its newer chipset, potentially resulting in better low-light performance and more accurate colors. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 7200 in the V27 is a clear winner here. It's built on a more efficient 4nm process and offers a noticeable performance boost over the V25 Pro's Dimensity 1300 (6nm). Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the V27. The V27's CPU configuration also appears more optimized for sustained performance.
Battery Life
The V27 holds a substantial advantage in battery endurance, with an impressive 134h endurance rating compared to the V25 Pro's 101h. While the V25 Pro charges slightly faster (40% in 15 mins vs 50% in 19 mins for the V27), the V27's longer battery life will likely outweigh this difference for most users.
Buying Guide
The vivo V27 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant display, smooth performance for gaming and multitasking, and a modern design. The vivo V25 Pro is a good option for those who value faster charging speeds and a slightly more compact form factor, but are less concerned about peak performance.