vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro vs vivo V27: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, and the blazing-fast 120W charging is a game-changer. However, the V27 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a more balanced feature set and potentially longer battery endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V27 | vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 164.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 197 g or 202 g (6.95 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold | Fearless Flame, Dark Storm |
| Models | V2231, V2246 | I2217 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 134h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V27
- Balanced feature set
- Solid battery endurance (134h)
- Respectable peak brightness (1055 nits)
- Less powerful chipset compared to iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Slower charging speed (66W)
vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (50% in 8 min)
- Likely optimized for gaming
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to V27
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays, but detailed specs beyond the V27's 1055 nits peak brightness are missing. The V27's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, typical of OLED panels. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro, positioned as a gaming device, likely boasts a higher refresh rate (though unconfirmed) and potentially better color accuracy optimized for gaming. The V27's brightness is respectable, making it usable outdoors, but the iQOO Neo 7 Pro likely offers a more immersive visual experience, assuming a higher refresh rate and optimized color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Given the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s performance focus, it may prioritize video recording capabilities. Sensor size and aperture are unknown for both, but the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of detail suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric flagship.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant step up from the vivo V27’s MediaTek Dimensity 7200 (4nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz, compared to the V27’s 2.8 GHz Cortex-A715. This translates to noticeably faster application loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s architecture is more focused on sustained performance, crucial for demanding games. The iQOO Neo 7 Pro will handle graphically intensive titles at higher settings with greater stability.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 has an endurance rating of 134 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro compensates for any potential battery capacity difference with its incredibly fast 120W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 8 minutes. The V27 takes 19 minutes for the same. This charging speed is a massive convenience factor, minimizing downtime. While the V27 may offer slightly longer overall battery life, the iQOO Neo 7 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any concerns about running out of power.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V27 if you need a phone with a balanced feature set, prioritizing a sleek design and a consistently good, if not exceptional, experience across all tasks. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 7 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and rapid charging – you're willing to trade some battery life for a substantial performance boost.