Vivo V27 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and sustained performance, the vivo V27 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7200, built on a 4nm process, offers superior efficiency, translating to a significantly longer endurance rating of 134 hours compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 80 hours.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V27 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2231, V2246 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 134h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V27
- Superior battery endurance (134h rating)
- More efficient Dimensity 7200 (4nm)
- Faster CPU cores for potential performance gains
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Marginally slower charging speed
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Slightly brighter display (1073 nits)
- Faster charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Potentially more attractive design (subjective)
- Significantly lower battery endurance (80h rating)
- Less efficient Dimensity 7030 (6nm)
- Potential for thermal throttling under load
Display Comparison
Both the vivo V27 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo feature vibrant displays, with the Edge 40 Neo boasting a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, slightly exceeding the V27’s 1055 nits. While this difference is noticeable in direct sunlight, both screens are perfectly usable outdoors. Both devices report an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the lack of information regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming frequency prevents a complete assessment of display quality; users sensitive to flicker may need to investigate further. The Edge 40 Neo’s slightly higher brightness is beneficial for outdoor use, but the V27’s display remains excellent.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and low resolution. Image processing styles will likely differentiate the two, but without sample images, it’s impossible to assess which phone produces more pleasing results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo V27 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo employs the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7200 provides a significant advantage in power efficiency. While the V27’s CPU features faster Cortex-A715 cores (2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz on the Edge 40 Neo), the real-world performance difference will likely be subtle in most everyday tasks. The 6nm process of the 7030 will likely result in higher temperatures under sustained load, potentially leading to thermal throttling. The V27’s chipset architecture is geared towards a balance of performance and efficiency, making it better suited for prolonged gaming or demanding applications.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The vivo V27 boasts an endurance rating of 134 hours, significantly outperforming the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 80 hours. This translates to a substantial advantage in real-world usage. While the Edge 40 Neo offers slightly faster 68W charging (50% in 15 minutes) compared to the V27’s 66W (50% in 19 minutes), the difference is minimal. The V27’s superior battery endurance means users will likely need to charge less frequently, offsetting the slightly slower charging speed. The Dimensity 7200’s 4nm process is the primary driver of this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V27 if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day and beyond, even with moderate to heavy use, and value a chipset optimized for efficiency. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility and want the convenience of marginally faster charging, even if it comes at the cost of battery longevity.