vivo V27 vs Motorola Edge 40: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 boasts superior battery life and a slightly brighter display, while the Motorola Edge 40 offers faster charging and wireless charging capabilities. Ultimately, the V27 is a better choice for longevity, while the Edge 40 prioritizes convenience. It's a close call!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V27 | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | V2231, V2246 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | About 380 EUR | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 134h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.2 LUFS (Average) | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V27
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- Stylish design
- Good selfie camera
- Performance slightly behind Edge 40
- No wireless charging
- Software experience may not appeal to everyone
Motorola Edge 40
- Faster charging (wired and wireless)
- Slightly better performance
- Clean and streamlined software
- Good video recording
- Shorter battery life
- Display slightly less bright
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature impressive OLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz, based on typical specs for these models). The vivo V27 edges out the Edge 40 with a slightly higher peak brightness of 1055 nits versus 1043 nits, making it marginally better for outdoor visibility. Both have excellent contrast ratios, offering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The vivo V27 may also have a slightly more curved display, which some users prefer for aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones likely offer versatile camera systems with multiple lenses (wide, ultrawide, potentially a macro or depth sensor). The vivo V27 is known for its strong selfie camera, while the Edge 40 might offer slightly better video recording capabilities. Detailed camera testing would be needed to definitively declare a winner.
Performance
The vivo V27's Mediatek Dimensity 7200 is a capable processor, but the Motorola Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 generally offers better performance. The 8020's higher clock speeds and slightly more advanced architecture translate to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. However, both phones should handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
This is where the vivo V27 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 134h significantly surpasses the Motorola Edge 40's 98h. This translates to noticeably longer battery life, allowing the V27 to easily last a full day and a half or even two days on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo V27 is ideal for users who prioritize long battery life and a vibrant display for media consumption. It's a great choice for those who want a stylish phone that can last through a full day (and then some). The Motorola Edge 40 is better suited for users who value fast charging, wireless charging, and a slightly more streamlined software experience.