vivo continues to impress with its stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The V27 Pro and V25 Pro are two strong contenders in the mid-range segment, offering compelling camera systems and attractive designs. But which one should you choose? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro edges out the V25 Pro thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset and brighter display. While both offer excellent camera capabilities and fast charging, the V27 Pro's performance boost makes it the overall winner for users prioritizing speed and visual clarity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2230 | V2158 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V27 Pro
- More powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Brighter display (978 nits)
- Longer battery endurance (121h)
- Sleek design
- Potentially higher price
- Camera performance needs further testing
vivo V25 Pro
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Excellent camera system
- Fast 66W charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Lower peak brightness (805 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance (101h)
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 Pro boasts a peak brightness of 978 nits, significantly higher than the V25 Pro's 805 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term indicating very high contrast), and offer vibrant colors and sharp details. The V27 Pro's brighter screen gives it a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, likely offering similar image quality in well-lit conditions. The V27 Pro may have a slight edge in low-light performance due to its newer chipset and potentially improved image processing algorithms. Both are expected to offer excellent selfie cameras and video recording capabilities, though specific features and resolutions may vary. Further testing would be needed to definitively declare a winner.
Performance
Here's where the V27 Pro truly shines. Its Dimensity 8200 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the V25 Pro's Dimensity 1300. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in graphically intensive games. The V27 Pro's CPU architecture also contributes to improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The V27 Pro holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 121h compared to the V25 Pro's 101h. Both phones support 66W fast charging, offering similar charging speeds (around 19 minutes for 50% and 30 minutes for 72%).
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V27 Pro? Users who prioritize performance, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the latest chipset. Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Those seeking a slightly more budget-friendly option with a still-excellent camera and a stylish design, and who don't heavily rely on demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V27 Pro worth the extra cost compared to the V25 Pro?
If performance and a brighter display are important to you, then yes. The V27 Pro's chipset upgrade makes a noticeable difference. However, if you're on a tighter budget and prioritize value, the V25 Pro remains a compelling option.
❓ What are the camera capabilities of each phone?
Both phones offer excellent camera systems, likely with similar image quality in good lighting. The V27 Pro may have a slight edge in low-light conditions. Specific camera specs (resolution, aperture, features) should be confirmed on the manufacturer's website.
