The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two strong contenders are the vivo V27 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset. However, the Galaxy A54 boasts Samsung's reliable software support and a more established ecosystem. Ultimately, the V27 Pro offers better performance, while the A54 provides greater long-term software assurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 01 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min, 72% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magic Blue, Noble Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2230 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.1 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 846767 (v9)
GeekBench: 3933 (v5.1), 3421 (v6)
GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V27 Pro
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 8200)
- Significantly Faster Charging (66W)
- Brighter Display
- Potentially More Versatile Camera
- Software Support May Not Be as Long-Term as Samsung
- Brand Recognition Less Established than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Reliable Software Updates (Samsung Ecosystem)
- Established Brand Reputation
- Good All-Around Performance
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP67)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Less Versatile Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent displays with infinite contrast ratios. The Galaxy A54 edges out the V27 Pro with a slightly higher peak brightness of 980 nits versus 978 nits, though the difference is minimal. Both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles. The V27 Pro may have a slightly more refined color calibration, but it's subjective.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The V27 Pro is expected to have a more versatile camera setup, potentially including a telephoto lens (based on typical vivo offerings). The Galaxy A54's camera is known for its consistent image processing and reliable performance in various lighting conditions. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but initial impressions suggest the V27 Pro may offer more creative options.
Performance
The vivo V27 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset is noticeably faster than the Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Dimensity 8200's architecture also offers improved power efficiency despite its higher performance.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 121h, slightly surpassing the Galaxy A54's 119h. However, the Galaxy A54's active use score of 11:15h suggests a more realistic battery life for typical users. The V27 Pro's 66W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for much faster top-ups compared to the Galaxy A54's 25W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo V27 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing performance, fast charging, and a vibrant display. It's a great choice for gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is best suited for users who value software updates, a reliable brand reputation, and a well-rounded experience with a focus on longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is expected to receive longer software updates and security patches due to Samsung's commitment to supporting its devices.
❓ Is the vivo V27 Pro good for gaming?
Yes, the vivo V27 Pro's Dimensity 8200 chipset provides excellent gaming performance, handling demanding titles with ease.