The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V25e and Samsung Galaxy A34 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes the crown thanks to its superior display, more efficient chipset, and longer software support. While the vivo V25e boasts faster charging, the A34's overall package delivers a more polished and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 30 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 07 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Color changing back panel color | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 58% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | V2201 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25e
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Stylish Design
- Good Value
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Shorter Software Support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter Display (1009 nits)
- More Efficient Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Longer Software Support
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Design Less Distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's display is a clear winner. Its 1009 nits peak brightness offers excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a significant advantage over the V25e. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests deep blacks and vibrant colors. The V25e's display is decent, but lacks the A34's punch and outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A34 likely has an edge in image processing and overall consistency. The V25e's camera is good for social media, but the A34's software optimizations and potentially better sensor size contribute to more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Video recording quality is likely comparable.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset generally outperforms the V25e's Helio G99. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 1080 provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. While both phones handle everyday tasks well, the A34 feels smoother and more capable for demanding apps and games.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34's endurance rating of 133h is exceptional, indicating significantly longer battery life than the V25e. While the V25e's 44W charging is faster, the A34's superior efficiency means you'll likely need to charge it less frequently.
Buying Guide
The vivo V25e is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a stylish design. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking a vibrant display, reliable performance, and extended software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34, with its Dimensity 1080 chipset, generally offers better gaming performance than the vivo V25e's Helio G99.
❓ How long will Samsung support the Galaxy A34 with software updates?
Samsung typically provides 4 years of OS updates and 5 years of security updates for its A-series phones, offering longer support than vivo.