The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V25e and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The V25e focuses on delivering strong CPU performance with the Helio G99, while the Edge 30 Neo prioritizes fast charging and a bright display. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a vibrant display, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the V25e’s 44W, and the 1004 nits peak brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility. However, the V25e’s Helio G99 offers competitive CPU performance for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 30 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 07 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | IP54, dust and water resistant | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Color changing back panel color | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 58% in 30 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Black, Sunrise Gold | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | V2201 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25e
- Strong CPU performance for the price
- Efficient 6nm Helio G99 chipset
- Competitive price point (likely)
- Slower 44W charging
- Display brightness and quality are unknown
- Limited camera details
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- 68W fast charging with 5W wireless
- Bright 1004 nits display
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Snapdragon 695 may not match the G99 in raw CPU power
- Camera details are limited
- Battery capacity is unknown
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the V25e (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the Edge 30 Neo’s display contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting a strong OLED panel. The V25e’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered. The brighter panel on the Edge 30 Neo is a clear advantage for outdoor users and media consumers.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout camera performer. It’s likely both rely on software processing to enhance image quality, and the 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant detail. The Edge 30 Neo’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 695 may offer slightly better noise reduction and dynamic range.
Performance
Both devices employ 6nm chipsets, but the architectures differ. The vivo V25e utilizes the Mediatek Helio G99 with a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, utilizing Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz and Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, Qualcomm’s Kryo cores generally offer better sustained performance and efficiency. The Edge 30 Neo’s 5G modem is also a benefit for future-proofing, while the V25e’s RAM configuration is unknown, potentially impacting multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo claims an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting good battery life. However, the real advantage lies in its charging speed: 68W wired and 5W wireless. This allows for a significantly faster recharge compared to the vivo V25e’s 44W wired charging, which is reported to reach 58% in 30 minutes. While the Edge 30 Neo’s battery capacity is not specified, the faster charging mitigates concerns about potential capacity differences. The inclusion of wireless charging on the Edge 30 Neo is a convenience feature absent on the V25e.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V25e if you need a phone that excels in CPU-intensive tasks like app switching and moderate gaming, and you’re willing to trade off charging speed and display brightness. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize rapid charging, a bright and vivid display for media consumption, and a generally smoother user experience thanks to Qualcomm’s optimizations.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable mid-range chip, but it's not designed for maximum settings in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. Expect to lower graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. The V25e's Helio G99 may offer slightly better sustained performance in some gaming scenarios, but both phones will require compromises.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the vivo V25e with the 44W charger?
vivo claims 58% charge in 30 minutes. Extrapolating from this, a full 0-100% charge is likely to take around 60-75 minutes. This is considerably slower than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W charging, which can top up the battery much faster.
❓ Is the lack of OIS on either phone a significant drawback for video recording?
Without Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), video recording will be more susceptible to shakiness, especially when walking or moving. Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) will help, but it's not as effective as OIS. If smooth video is a priority, consider phones in a higher price bracket that offer OIS.
