The vivo V series consistently delivers stylish designs and impressive features at competitive prices. The V25 and V27 are two of the latest contenders, each boasting unique strengths. But which one is right for you? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, more powerful chipset, faster charging, and slightly better battery endurance. While the V25 remains a solid choice, the V27 offers a noticeable upgrade in key areas, justifying its likely higher price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 21 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | Color changing back panel color |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | V2202 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 380 EUR |
| SAR | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 120h
|
Endurance rating 134h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 613641 (v9)
GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6)
GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25
- Potentially more affordable
- Good battery life (120h)
- Stylish design
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
vivo V27
- Brighter display (1055 nits)
- Faster performance (Dimensity 7200)
- Faster charging (66W)
- Slightly better battery endurance (134h)
- Likely more expensive
- Camera performance needs further testing
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 1055 nits compared to the V25's 781 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility in direct sunlight and a more vibrant viewing experience. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term indicating very high contrast), and both likely use OLED panels for excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Based on available information, both likely offer versatile shooting modes and good image quality in well-lit conditions. The V27 may have a slight edge in low-light performance due to its newer chipset and potentially improved image processing algorithms. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The V27's Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4nm) chipset is a substantial upgrade over the V25's Dimensity 900 (6nm). The newer chipset offers improved CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Cortex-A715 cores in the V27 are also more powerful than the V25's Cortex-A78 cores.
Battery Life
The V27 edges out the V25 in battery endurance, with an endurance rating of 134 hours compared to 120 hours. However, the V27's 66W wired charging is significantly faster than the V25's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V25? Users prioritizing a slightly more budget-friendly option and who don't heavily rely on peak performance or extremely bright displays. Who should buy the vivo V27? Those seeking a premium experience with a vibrant display, faster performance, and quicker charging speeds, and are willing to invest a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V27 worth the extra cost compared to the V25?
If you prioritize a brighter display, faster performance, and quicker charging, then the V27 is likely worth the extra investment. However, if you're on a tighter budget and don't need those features, the V25 remains a capable device.
❓ What are the camera capabilities of each phone?
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more testing. Both likely provide good image quality in well-lit conditions, with the V27 potentially having a slight edge in low-light scenarios.
