The vivo V series consistently delivers stylish design and impressive features at a competitive price point. Choosing between the V25 and V23 5G can be tricky, as both offer compelling packages. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 edges out the V23 5G thanks to its significantly better battery life and brighter display. While the V23 5G boasts a slightly faster chipset, the V25's overall package provides a more well-rounded and longer-lasting experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | V2202 | V2130, V2303 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 120h
|
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9)
GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25
- Significantly better battery life
- Brighter display
- Stylish design
- Good overall performance
- Slightly slower chipset than V23 5G
- Camera performance needs further testing
vivo V23 5G
- Slightly faster chipset
- Compact form factor
- Good camera system
- Shorter battery life
- Less bright display
- May feel less premium than V25
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 takes the lead in display quality. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 781 nits, significantly higher than the V23 5G's 629 nits. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term), but the V25's higher brightness translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions and a more immersive viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Both likely offer a primary wide-angle lens, an ultrawide lens, and a macro lens. The V25 may have slightly improved image processing due to newer software. Video recording capabilities are likely similar, supporting 4K recording on both devices.
Performance
The vivo V23 5G holds a slight advantage in performance due to its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset, which has a marginally faster CPU clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz for the Cortex-A78 core). However, in real-world usage, the difference is likely to be minimal for most users. Both phones offer smooth performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 is the clear winner in battery life. Its endurance rating of 120 hours is significantly higher than the V23 5G's 103 hours. This translates to noticeably longer usage times between charges, making the V25 a better choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The vivo V25 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life, a vibrant display, and a stylish design. The vivo V23 5G is a good choice for those who value slightly faster performance and a more compact form factor, especially if they frequently use demanding apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo V23 5G has a slightly faster chipset, but both phones should handle most games well. The V25's larger battery might be preferable for longer gaming sessions.
❓ Does the vivo V25 support 5G?
Yes, both the vivo V25 and V23 5G support 5G connectivity.
