The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V25 and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the vivo V25 thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and faster software updates. While the V25 boasts impressive battery endurance and faster charging, the A54's overall package provides a more polished and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 21 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2202 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 120h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25
- Exceptional battery life
- Fast 44W charging
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Dimmer display
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient chipset
- Excellent software support and updates
- Good camera performance
- Slower 25W charging
- Can be slightly more expensive
- Design is less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 980 nits significantly surpasses the vivo V25's 781 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility. Both offer 'Infinite' contrast ratios (likely a marketing term), but the A54's higher brightness makes a noticeable difference. Color accuracy is generally good on both, but Samsung's display often has a slight edge in vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A54 generally produces more consistent and pleasing results. The A54's image processing tends to be more natural, while the V25 can sometimes over-saturate colors. Low-light performance is competitive, with the A54 often capturing slightly more detail. Video recording is solid on both, but the A54's stabilization is generally superior.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 generally outperforms the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the vivo V25. While both are octa-core processors, the A54's 5nm process offers better efficiency and slightly improved performance in demanding tasks. The A54 also benefits from Samsung's software optimization, leading to a smoother and more responsive user experience. Gaming performance is comparable, but the A54 handles more graphically intensive games slightly better.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 120h. However, the Galaxy A54's active use score of 11:15h is still very respectable. The V25's 44W charging is faster than the A54's 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo V25 is ideal for users prioritizing battery life and fast charging, and those who appreciate a stylish design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those who value a brighter, more vibrant display, smoother performance, and the reliability of Samsung's software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner here. Samsung is known for providing timely software updates and security patches for its devices, often for several years.
❓ Is the vivo V25 worth buying if battery life is my top priority?
Absolutely! The vivo V25 offers exceptional battery life, making it a great choice for users who need a phone that can last through multiple days of moderate use.
