The vivo V25 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices aim for a balance of features and affordability, they take different approaches to achieving it. The V25 prioritizes a strong processor, while the Edge 30 Neo focuses on rapid charging and a brighter display, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its significantly faster 68W charging and brighter 1004-nit display outweigh the V25’s slightly more powerful processor, especially considering the similar battery endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 74.2 x 7.8 mm (6.27 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2404 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 61% in 30 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Elegant Black, Sunrise Gold, Surfing Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | V2202 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| SAR | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.24 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 120h
|
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 461428 (v9)
GeekBench: 2023 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 21fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25
- More powerful processor for demanding tasks
- Slightly better battery endurance rating
- Potentially better image processing due to ISP
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Lower peak display brightness
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Much faster 68W wired charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Wireless charging support
- Less powerful processor
- Slightly lower battery endurance rating
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a clear advantage in display brightness, achieving a measured 1004 nits compared to the vivo V25’s 781 nits. This translates to significantly better outdoor visibility, particularly in direct sunlight. Both phones share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. While neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (LTPO or standard AMOLED), the brightness difference is the key differentiator, making the Edge 30 Neo more usable in bright environments. The V25's lower brightness may require users to increase brightness, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both phones rely on similar mid-range camera setups. The absence of specific details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography. Focusing on the chipset, the V25's Dimensity 900 has a more powerful ISP, potentially leading to slightly better image processing, but this is speculative without further data.
Performance
Under the hood, the vivo V25 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo, however, is powered by the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a slight theoretical performance edge, the real-world difference will be minimal for most users. Both chipsets are 6nm, suggesting similar power efficiency. The Edge 30 Neo’s GPU performance will likely be lower, potentially impacting gaming experiences at higher settings.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 achieves an endurance rating of 120 hours, while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo scores 104 hours. However, this difference is largely offset by the Edge 30 Neo’s significantly faster charging. The V25 supports 44W wired charging, reaching 61% in 30 minutes. In contrast, the Edge 30 Neo boasts 68W wired charging *and* 5W wireless charging. This faster charging capability means less downtime and greater convenience, effectively mitigating the slightly lower endurance rating. A full charge on the Edge 30 Neo will likely be significantly faster than on the V25.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V25 if you need a phone with a more capable processor for demanding tasks like video editing or consistently high frame rates in graphically intensive games. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a vibrant, easily visible display, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging – ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it can handle Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, users seeking consistently high frame rates or maximum graphical fidelity may experience some stuttering. The Dimensity 900 in the V25 will offer a smoother experience, but the difference won't be dramatic.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Motorola Edge 30 Neo with the 68W charger?
Motorola claims a full charge from 0-100% with the 68W charger takes approximately 50 minutes. This is a significant improvement over the V25’s 44W charging, which will take considerably longer to reach a full charge.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. Expect competent, but not exceptional, camera performance in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely to be average.
