vivo continues to impress with its stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The V25 Pro and V23 Pro are two of their latest offerings, both boasting impressive cameras and sleek designs. But which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro edges out the V23 Pro thanks to its faster 66W charging and slightly brighter display. While the V23 Pro boasts a marginally better endurance rating, the V25 Pro's overall improvements in charging speed and display brightness make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation α glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min |
| Type | 4830 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | V2158 | V2132 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 460 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 101h
|
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9)
GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster 66W Charging
- Slightly Brighter Display
- Generally better performance (Dimensity 1300)
- Slightly lower battery endurance compared to V23 Pro
vivo V23 Pro
- Excellent Battery Life
- Capable Camera System
- Stylish Design
- Slower 44W Charging
- Slightly dimmer display
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate and a Full HD+ resolution, offering smooth visuals and vibrant colors. The V25 Pro has a slightly higher peak brightness of 805 nits compared to the V23 Pro's 798 nits, resulting in marginally better outdoor visibility. Both have an infinite contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera setups, with a focus on selfie capabilities. The V25 Pro typically has a 64MP main camera and a 108MP front camera, while the V23 Pro has a 64MP main camera and a 50MP front camera. Both offer excellent image quality in various lighting conditions, with features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos. Low-light performance is also commendable on both.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity chipset, specifically the Dimensity 1300 in the V25 Pro and the Dimensity 1200 in the V23 Pro. While both are capable processors, the Dimensity 1300 generally offers a slight performance advantage, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. Expect smooth multitasking and gaming on both devices.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 Pro holds a slight edge in battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 110 hours compared to the V25 Pro's 101 hours. However, the V25 Pro significantly closes the gap with its much faster 66W charging, reaching 40% in just 15 minutes and 71% in 30 minutes, while the V23 Pro takes longer with its 44W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo V25 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging and a vibrant display. It's a great choice for content creators and those who enjoy media consumption. The vivo V23 Pro is a solid option for those seeking excellent battery life and a capable camera system, especially if charging speed isn't a top concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V25 Pro worth the upgrade from the V23 Pro?
If fast charging and a slightly brighter display are important to you, then the V25 Pro is a worthwhile upgrade. However, if battery life is your absolute top priority, the V23 Pro remains a strong contender.
❓ Which phone has better low-light camera performance?
Both phones perform well in low light, but the V25 Pro's slightly larger sensor and improved image processing algorithms may give it a marginal advantage.
