vivo V25 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the V25 Pro thanks to its superior battery life, brighter display, and faster software updates. While the V25 Pro boasts faster charging, the A54's overall package provides a more polished and long-lasting experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V25 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4830 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2158 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 440 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 704090 (v9) GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster Charging (66W)
- Vibrant Color Palette
- Stylish Design
- Good Selfie Camera
- Lower Peak Brightness
- Less Efficient Chipset
- Software Updates Less Frequent
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Battery Life
- Brighter Display
- Samsung's Software Support
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP67)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Vibrant Colors (more natural)
- Design Less Distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, significantly brighter than the V25 Pro's 805 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the A54's higher brightness makes it more usable in direct sunlight. Both feature vibrant AMOLED panels, but Samsung's implementation feels slightly more refined.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems. The V25 Pro is known for its vibrant color processing, while the A54 tends towards more natural-looking images. Low-light performance is competitive, but the A54's image processing often produces cleaner results. Video recording capabilities are similar, with both offering 4K recording.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 generally offers slightly better sustained performance than the Mediatek Dimensity 1300 in the V25 Pro. While both CPUs are Octa-core, the A54's 5nm process provides better efficiency. Gaming performance is comparable, but the A54 might handle demanding tasks for longer without throttling.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h significantly surpasses the V25 Pro's 101h. The A54's larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset contribute to its impressive longevity. However, the V25 Pro's 66W charging is considerably faster than the A54's 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Users prioritizing fast charging and a vibrant color palette. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor use, and the reliability of Samsung's software support.