vivo V25 Pro vs Oppo Reno8 T 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful chipset and impressive battery endurance. However, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G offers faster charging and a competitive price. For performance enthusiasts, the V25 Pro wins, but budget-conscious users might lean towards the Reno8 T 5G.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V25 Pro | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Color changing back panel color Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4830 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pure Black, Sailing Blue | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | V2158 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 440 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 101h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -27.3 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 704090 (v9) GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V25 Pro
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 1300)
- Exceptional Battery Life (101h Endurance)
- Higher Display Brightness (805 nits)
- Likely better camera quality
- Potentially higher price
- Charging speed slightly slower (66W)
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster Charging (67W)
- More Affordable Price
- 5G Connectivity
- Stylish Design
- Weaker Performance (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Shorter Battery Life
- Lower Display Brightness
- Likely inferior camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the vivo V25 Pro takes a slight edge with a measured peak brightness of 805 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Reno8 T 5G's display is still excellent, but the V25 Pro's higher brightness provides a more immersive viewing experience. Both likely use AMOLED panels with a 120Hz refresh rate, though this is not explicitly stated for the Reno8 T 5G.
Camera Comparison
The vivo V25 Pro is expected to have a more versatile and higher-quality camera system. While specific megapixel counts are not provided, the Dimensity 1300 typically pairs with capable camera sensors. The Reno8 T 5G likely features a 108MP main camera, but image processing and overall quality may not match the V25 Pro. Both phones likely offer good video recording capabilities.
Performance
The vivo V25 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1300 offers a noticeable boost in processing power, making it better suited for demanding games and multitasking. The Reno8 T 5G is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo V25 Pro shines in battery life, boasting an incredible endurance rating of 101 hours. This is a substantial advantage over the Reno8 T 5G. While the Reno8 T 5G offers faster 67W charging (100% in 44 minutes), the V25 Pro's superior battery capacity ensures it will last much longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Users prioritizing performance, camera quality, and long battery life will appreciate the V25 Pro. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G? Those seeking a stylish 5G phone with fast charging and a more affordable price point will find the Reno8 T 5G appealing.