Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G vs. vivo V23e: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Helio G96 in demanding tasks, and its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the V23e's 44W.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23e | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 09 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | - | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility
- Camera details are limited, making a direct comparison difficult
- Software experience may vary based on MIUI version
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Sleek and stylish design (based on brand reputation)
- Adequate 44W charging for casual users
- Comparable battery endurance to the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Less efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Lower peak display brightness potentially impacting outdoor visibility
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 746 nits, a significant advantage over the V23e (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their price points, the Redmi’s higher brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also features an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting optimized color and black levels. Without specific details on the V23e’s panel characteristics, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G appears to offer a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand reputation suggests a greater emphasis on camera features and image processing. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It's likely both rely heavily on software algorithms to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the vivo V23e features the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm fabrication process is inherently more power-efficient, leading to better thermal management and potentially less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver on the Redmi versus 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 on the vivo – suggests a slight edge in peak performance for the Snapdragon, though real-world differences will depend on software optimization. The Redmi’s 5G modem also provides a more future-proof connectivity solution.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, reaching 50% in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes, with support for PD3.0 and QC3. The vivo V23e’s 44W charging reaches 69% in 30 minutes. While the V23e’s battery life is comparable, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s significantly faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e if you prioritize a sleek design and are primarily a casual user focused on social media and light tasks. Its 44W charging is adequate for everyday use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value longer-term performance, faster charging speeds, and a more robust 5G experience, making it ideal for gamers and power users.