Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE vs. vivo V23e: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a smoother overall experience, the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in both CPU and GPU tasks, justifying its slightly higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23e | Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 09 | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 158 g (5.57 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Global), 5.1 (India) |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 (Global), Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (India) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Truffle Black (Vinyl Black), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Snowflake White (Diamond Dazzle) |
| Models | - | 2109119DG, 2107119DC, 2109119DI |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 527663 (v9) GeekBench: 2832 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Potentially better camera image processing
- More efficient power consumption
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- May be slightly more expensive
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
- Faster 44W wired charging
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful and efficient Helio G96 chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given Xiaomi’s history with vibrant displays, it’s likely the 11 Lite 5G NE offers a slightly more visually striking experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rates, impacting smoothness during scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi generally focuses on computational photography, potentially giving the 11 Lite 5G NE an edge in image processing. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value. The Snapdragon’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also generally more advanced, potentially leading to better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This contrasts with the vivo V23e’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm), featuring 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, translating to less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions and better battery life. The architectural advantage of the A78 cores in the 778G also provides a performance boost in demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the vivo V23e’s 44W charging versus the Xiaomi’s 33W. The faster charging on the V23e (69% in 30 minutes) is a significant convenience factor. However, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior power efficiency could offset the slightly slower charging speed, resulting in comparable daily usability. The actual battery capacity (mAh) remains unknown for both devices, making a definitive judgment challenging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e if you prioritize fast charging (44W) and a sleek design, and your primary use case revolves around everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light photography. Buy the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE if you demand better sustained performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and value a more efficient processor for longer-term usability.