Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs. vivo V23e: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset offers a noticeable advantage in processing power and gaming, while the 800 nit display provides better outdoor visibility. The V23e counters with faster 44W charging, but the A52s 5G’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23e | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 09 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 330 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant display (800 nits)
- Potentially better camera image quality
- More efficient chipset for longer sustained performance
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- May be slightly more expensive
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Faster 44W charging
- Sleek and stylish design
- Competitive price point
- Good battery endurance
- Less powerful Helio G96 chipset
- Potentially dimmer display
- Less refined image processing
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 800 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo V23e. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both displays are likely to utilize AMOLED technology (based on market segment), the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a more visually impactful experience. The V23e’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and potential PWM dimming rates unanswered, which could impact users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the V23e. The A52s 5G likely features a more robust camera system, benefiting from Samsung’s image processing expertise. While both will likely include a standard wide, ultrawide, and macro setup, the A52s 5G’s larger sensor (likely) and potentially better lens apertures will result in superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The V23e’s camera system is likely geared towards social media sharing, while the A52s 5G aims for more versatile and higher-quality photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is powered by the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), featuring a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores. This architecture, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a substantial performance advantage over the vivo V23e’s MediaTek MT6781 Helio G96 (12nm). The Helio G96 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm node of the Snapdragon 778G translates to better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The A52s 5G’s CPU configuration, with its faster and more modern A78 cores, will deliver a snappier experience in demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the V23e). However, the charging speeds diverge significantly. The vivo V23e supports 44W wired charging, achieving 69% charge in 30 minutes, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is limited to 25W. This means the V23e can top up much faster, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need a quick boost. However, the A52s 5G’s efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset may offset the slower charging with lower overall power consumption.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e if you prioritize rapid charging and a sleek design, and your usage primarily revolves around social media, casual browsing, and light photography. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you demand smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and a more vibrant display, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds. The A52s 5G is the better option for power users and mobile gamers.