Realme 9 Pro+ vs vivo V23e: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 920 processor and faster 60W charging. However, the vivo V23e remains a compelling option for everyday users seeking a reliable and efficient device at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23e | Realme 9 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 09 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 09 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | - | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9) GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1) GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable and efficient chipset
- Less powerful processor compared to the Realme 9 Pro+
- Slower charging speeds
- Likely inferior display quality
Realme 9 Pro+
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 920)
- 60W fast charging with PD3.0
- Excellent battery endurance (117h)
- Higher price tag
- Potential for more heat generation under heavy load
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for the vivo V23e. However, given its market positioning, it likely features a standard LCD panel. The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a VA-type panel offering deeper blacks than the V23e’s likely LCD. The Realme’s panel is expected to deliver a more immersive viewing experience, particularly with HDR content. Without specific brightness data for the V23e, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility, but the 9 Pro+ is likely superior in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer detailed camera specs beyond the presence of photo/video capabilities. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The V23e, while capable, will likely rely on software optimizations to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. Without specific aperture and sensor size details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Realme’s positioning suggests a stronger emphasis on camera performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+’s MediaTek Dimensity 920 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo V23e’s Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 920 utilizes more efficient 6nm fabrication, resulting in better thermal management and sustained performance. Its Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer a significant performance advantage over the V23e’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Realme. While both phones share 6x Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, the overall system performance of the 9 Pro+ is demonstrably higher.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+’s 60W charging with PD3.0 is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 44 minutes. The vivo V23e’s 44W charging, while respectable, is noticeably slower. The Realme 9 Pro+ also boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the V23e’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Dimensity 920 in the 9 Pro+ likely offsets any potential capacity difference, resulting in comparable or even better real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e if you need a dependable daily driver with adequate performance for social media, browsing, and casual gaming, and value a potentially lower price. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prioritize smooth multitasking, demanding mobile games, and faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeable performance boost.