vivo V23e 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its brighter 830-nit display and proven endurance rating of 113 hours outweigh the vivo V23e 5G’s faster 44W charging. However, the V23e’s Dimensity 810 offers a competitive performance profile for the price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23e 5G | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 23 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Coast (Sunshine Gold), Moonlight Shadow (Midnight Blue) | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | V2126 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 350 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e 5G
- Faster 44W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- Competitive performance from the Dimensity 810 chipset.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Likely inferior display quality compared to the A53.
- Uncertain long-term software support.
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Brighter and more vibrant Super AMOLED display.
- Excellent battery life with a 113-hour endurance rating.
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem and update commitment.
- Slower 25W charging.
- Exynos 1280 can exhibit some thermal throttling under heavy load.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality with a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the V23e 5G’s display specs are not provided, it’s unlikely to match the A53’s brightness. The A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a Super AMOLED panel, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, a contrast to the likely LCD panel in the V23e. This makes the A53 a better choice for media consumption and outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the V23e 5G. The A53 5G likely features a more sophisticated camera system, typical of Samsung’s mid-range offerings. While the presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A53 is largely inconsequential, the larger main sensor (spec not provided, but assumed larger than V23e) and potential for optical image stabilization (OIS) would give it an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Samsung’s image processing algorithms are also generally more refined.
Performance
Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration (2x high-performance, 6x efficiency). However, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280, built on a 5nm process, has a clear architectural advantage over the vivo V23e 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Cortex-A78 cores in the Exynos 1280 offer superior single-core performance compared to the A76 cores in the Dimensity 810. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Exynos 1280 will likely exhibit smoother performance in demanding applications and games. The 5nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s endurance rating of 113 hours indicates excellent battery life, despite not having the fastest charging speed. The vivo V23e 5G compensates with 44W wired charging, capable of reaching 69% charge in just 30 minutes. However, a faster charging speed doesn’t necessarily translate to a better overall experience if the battery capacity is significantly smaller (capacity not provided for V23e). The A53’s endurance rating suggests a larger battery and more efficient power management, making it the better choice for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e 5G if you prioritize rapid charging and a slightly more streamlined software experience, and are comfortable with potentially less consistent long-term software support. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you value a brighter, more visible display, longer battery life, and Samsung’s established ecosystem and software update commitment.