The vivo V23e 5G and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. The V23e 5G, while an older model, focuses on a balance of features, while the Edge 30 Neo aims for a more modern, compact design with faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the better choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the V23e 5G’s 44W, and the 104-hour endurance rating suggests efficient power management, despite similar battery capacities. However, the V23e 5G offers a potentially more powerful processor for demanding tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 23 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 01 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 74.3 x 7.4 mm (6.33 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 69% in 30 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | 4050 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Coast (Sunshine Gold), Moonlight Shadow (Midnight Blue) | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | V2126 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23e 5G
- Potentially stronger single-core CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- Established brand reputation in certain markets
- Competitive pricing (depending on region)
- Slower 44W charging
- Less detailed display specifications
- Limited camera information
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Compact and modern design
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds
- Snapdragon 695 may throttle under sustained load
- Reliance on software for camera performance
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the V23e 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Edge 30 Neo’s contrast ratio is listed as ‘Infinite’ (nominal), this is typical marketing language; the real-world benefit lies in the superior brightness. The V23e 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but the Edge 30 Neo clearly has the advantage in raw display performance.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 30 Neo likely prioritizes image processing and software features. The V23e 5G may rely more on its hardware, but without specifics, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range. The absence of details regarding OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
Both devices utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The vivo V23e 5G is powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 810, featuring a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.4 GHz, suggesting stronger single-core performance. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, with Kryo 660 Gold cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. While the Dimensity 810’s clock speed is higher, the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized architecture and potentially better sustained performance due to thermal efficiency. The V23e 5G may excel in bursty tasks, while the Edge 30 Neo could offer more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a clear advantage over the V23e 5G’s 44W. The Edge 30 Neo can achieve a significant charge in a short amount of time, while the V23e 5G will take considerably longer. Both phones share a 104-hour endurance rating, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the faster charging of the Edge 30 Neo mitigates any potential concerns about battery drain, offering more flexibility and peace of mind.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V23e 5G if you need a phone with a processor geared towards more intensive tasks, and are willing to trade some charging speed and potentially battery endurance for that extra processing power. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a compact form factor, incredibly fast charging, and a consistently reliable battery experience throughout the day, even with moderate to heavy use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it can handle Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, expect some frame drops during intense combat scenarios. The Dimensity 810 in the V23e 5G might offer slightly better peak performance, but both phones will require compromises in graphical settings for a smooth gaming experience.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Motorola Edge 30 Neo with the 68W charger?
Motorola claims the Edge 30 Neo can charge from 0-100% in approximately 50 minutes with the 68W charger. Real-world results may vary slightly depending on usage during charging, but it's significantly faster than the V23e 5G's 44W charging, which will likely take over an hour.
❓ Is the 104-hour endurance rating for both phones realistic for typical daily use?
The 104-hour endurance rating is based on Motorola's testing methodology, which simulates a specific usage pattern. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on your individual usage – screen brightness, app usage, 5G connectivity, and gaming all impact battery drain. Expect closer to 1-1.5 days of typical use on both devices.
