vivo V23 Pro vs vivo X90 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster chipset, vastly superior charging speeds, and a brighter display. While the V23 Pro offers impressive battery life, the X90 Pro's overall performance and premium features justify its higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23 Pro | vivo X90 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 13 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 164.1 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 214.9 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation α glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 108˚ 16mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | 4870 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Legendary Black, Red |
| Models | V2132 | V2242A, V2219 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.6 LUFS (Average) | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9) GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1228735 (v9) GeekBench: 4273 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23 Pro
- Excellent battery life
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Decent camera performance
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
vivo X90 Pro
- Flagship performance
- Exceptional camera capabilities
- Ultra-fast charging (120W)
- Bright and vibrant display
- Wireless charging
- Higher price
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (compared to V23 Pro)
Display Comparison
The vivo X90 Pro takes a commanding lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 934 nits significantly surpasses the V23 Pro's 798 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility and a more vibrant viewing experience. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the X90 Pro's superior brightness makes a noticeable difference.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the X90 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The X90 Pro likely features a larger sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more precise comparison, but the Dimensity 9200's ISP generally provides better processing capabilities.
Performance
The chipset difference is substantial. The X90 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 9200, built on a 4nm process, is considerably more powerful than the V23 Pro's Dimensity 1200 (6nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly improved gaming performance on the X90 Pro. The CPU architecture also favors the X90 Pro with newer Cortex cores.
Battery Life
The V23 Pro holds a slight edge in endurance rating (110h vs 96h), suggesting it might last a bit longer on a single charge under moderate usage. However, the X90 Pro's 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times (50% in 8 minutes) compared to the V23 Pro's 44W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V23 Pro? Users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point. Who should buy the vivo X90 Pro? Photography enthusiasts, power users demanding top-tier performance, and those who value fast charging and a premium experience.