vivo continues to impress with its stylish and feature-packed smartphones. The V23 Pro and V25 Pro are two of their latest offerings, both boasting impressive cameras and sleek designs. But which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro edges out the V23 Pro thanks to its significantly faster 66W charging and a slightly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset. While both offer excellent camera performance, the V25 Pro’s charging speed provides a noticeable advantage for daily use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 13 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | - | Color changing back panel color
Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation α glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4300 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2132 | V2158 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 110h
|
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
|
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9)
GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 704090 (v9)
GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23 Pro
- Slightly longer battery endurance
- Stylish design
- Excellent selfie camera
- Slower charging speed
- Dimensity 1200 chipset is slightly less powerful
vivo V25 Pro
- Faster 66W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- OIS on main camera
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (though minimal)
- Design might be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and immersive visuals. The V25 Pro boasts a marginally higher peak brightness of 805 nits compared to the V23 Pro's 798 nits, but the difference is barely perceptible in real-world usage. Both have excellent contrast ratios (Infinite nominal).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera systems, with a focus on selfie capabilities. They both have a 50MP front camera. The V23 Pro has a triple rear camera setup (50MP main, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro), while the V25 Pro has a triple rear camera setup (64MP main with OIS, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro). The V25 Pro's OIS on the main camera provides better stability for videos and low-light photography. Both capture excellent photos and videos in various conditions.
Performance
The vivo V25 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset, a step up from the V23 Pro's Dimensity 1200. While both feature the same CPU core configuration, the Dimensity 1300 generally offers slightly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming. Both phones handle everyday usage with ease.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 Pro has a slightly higher endurance rating (110h) compared to the V25 Pro (101h), suggesting marginally better battery life under typical usage. However, the V25 Pro's 66W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge significantly faster than the V23 Pro's 44W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V23 Pro? Those prioritizing slightly longer battery endurance (though the difference is minimal) and are comfortable with 44W charging. Who should buy the vivo V25 Pro? Users who value faster charging speeds and a bit more processing power will find the V25 Pro a better fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V25 Pro worth the upgrade from the V23 Pro?
If fast charging and a bit more performance are important to you, then yes. The V25 Pro's 66W charging is a significant improvement. Otherwise, the V23 Pro remains a capable device.
❓ Which phone has better low-light camera performance?
The vivo V25 Pro likely has better low-light camera performance due to the OIS on its main camera, which helps stabilize the sensor and reduce noise.
