The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V23 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer appealing features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V23 Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and generally more powerful chipset. However, the Galaxy A73 5G boasts a more established brand reputation and potentially better software support. It's a close call, but the V23 Pro offers a more premium experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 13 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation α glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | V2132 | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 110h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9)
GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V23 Pro
- Faster Charging (44W)
- Brighter Display (798 nits)
- Potentially More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1200)
- Excellent Battery Life (110h Endurance)
- Brand Recognition (less established than Samsung)
- Software Support (potentially shorter update lifespan)
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Established Brand Reputation (Samsung)
- Potentially Longer Software Support
- Versatile Camera System
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Bright Display (estimated)
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
Display Comparison
The vivo V23 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, significantly brighter than the Galaxy A73 5G's likely range (estimated around 800-900 nits). Both feature AMOLED displays with vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the V23 Pro's brightness advantage makes it more usable outdoors. The contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the V23 Pro, which is a nominal value, but suggests excellent contrast.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems. The V23 Pro is known for its selfie camera capabilities, often featuring high megapixel counts and advanced features. The Galaxy A73 5G typically excels in image processing and offers a more consistent camera experience across all lenses. Detailed camera comparisons would require extensive testing, but both are capable of producing excellent photos in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The vivo V23 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1200 generally outperforms the Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Galaxy A73 5G in raw processing power. While both chipsets are capable for everyday tasks, the V23 Pro will handle demanding games and multitasking more smoothly. The Dimensity 1200's GPU also offers a noticeable edge in graphics performance.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 Pro's endurance rating of 110h is exceptionally high, suggesting excellent battery life. Coupled with its 44W fast charging (reaching 63% in 30 minutes), it offers a significant advantage over the Galaxy A73 5G's 25W charging. The A73 5G likely has a larger battery capacity, but the V23 Pro's charging speed makes up for any potential difference.
Buying Guide
The vivo V23 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, a vibrant display, and a smoother overall performance. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G is a good choice for those who value brand reliability, a potentially longer software update lifespan, and a more understated design.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The vivo V23 Pro boasts an impressive 110h endurance rating, suggesting superior battery life, especially when combined with its faster charging capabilities.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G worth buying?
The Galaxy A73 5G is a solid choice if you prioritize brand reliability and potentially longer software support. However, the vivo V23 Pro offers a more premium experience with faster charging and a brighter display.
