The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V23 Pro and Oppo Reno8 T 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer appealing features, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G takes the lead with its significantly faster charging and a more modern chipset. However, the vivo V23 Pro boasts a brighter display and potentially better camera performance in certain scenarios. Ultimately, the Reno8 T 5G offers better value for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 13 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation α), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.5 x 73.3 x 7.4 mm (6.28 x 2.89 x 0.29 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation α glass | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 63% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 4300 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | V2132 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| SAR | 1.22 W/kg (head) 0.63 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 110h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.6 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 635060 (v8), 716766 (v9)
GeekBench: 12377 (v4.4), 3021 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V23 Pro
- Brighter Display
- Potentially Better Camera
- Excellent Battery Life (Endurance)
- Slower Charging
- Older Chipset
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster Charging (67W)
- More Modern Chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially Less Bright Display
- Camera may not be as versatile
Display Comparison
The vivo V23 Pro features a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is infinite (nominal), suggesting deep blacks. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G likely has a slightly lower peak brightness, but still provides a good viewing experience. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
The vivo V23 Pro is known for its selfie camera capabilities and overall camera versatility. While specific camera specs are missing, it likely offers good image quality in various lighting conditions. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G's camera system is likely more standard for its class, providing reliable photos and videos. Detailed camera comparisons would require more specific information on sensor sizes and software processing.
Performance
The vivo V23 Pro's Mediatek Dimensity 1200 is a capable chipset, but the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G, while lower on paper, benefits from more recent architecture and optimizations, potentially offering better efficiency and smoother performance in everyday tasks and 5G connectivity. Gaming performance will likely be similar, but the Reno8 T 5G might have a slight edge.
Battery Life
The vivo V23 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Oppo Reno8 T 5G's 67W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a full charge in just 44 minutes, compared to the V23 Pro's 44% in 30 minutes. While the V23 Pro lasts longer, the Reno8 T 5G recharges much faster.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V23 Pro? Users prioritizing a vibrant display and potentially superior camera quality, especially in low light, might lean towards the V23 Pro. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 T 5G? Those seeking fast charging, a more efficient chipset, and a generally smoother experience should consider the Reno8 T 5G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G might offer slightly smoother performance and better efficiency for gaming, although both phones are capable of handling most mobile games.
❓ Is the vivo V23 Pro worth the extra cost?
It depends on your priorities. If you value a brighter display and potentially better camera quality, the V23 Pro might be worth it. However, the Reno8 T 5G offers better value with its faster charging and more modern chipset.
