vivo V23 5G vs vivo V25 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V25 Pro edges out the V23 5G thanks to its brighter display, more powerful chipset, and faster charging. While the V23 5G offers excellent battery life, the V25 Pro's overall performance and features make it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23 5G | vivo V25 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 19 | Available. Released 2022, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm | 158.9 x 73.5 x 8.6 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color Resistant to drops, scratches, and sweat | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min | 66W wired, 40% in 15 min, 71% in 30 min |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 4830 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Pure Black, Sailing Blue |
| Models | V2130, V2303 | V2158 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9) GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 704090 (v9) GeekBench: 2521 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23 5G
- Exceptional battery life
- Stylish design
- Good value for money
- Decent camera performance
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
vivo V25 Pro
- Brighter display
- Faster performance
- Faster charging
- Improved image processing (likely)
- Slightly shorter battery life (marginally)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The vivo V25 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 805 nits compared to the V23 5G's 629 nits. Both feature excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the V25 Pro's higher brightness makes it more comfortable to use outdoors and in bright environments. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The V25 Pro is expected to have slightly improved image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. Both likely offer versatile camera setups with wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, plus a selfie camera.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 1300 in the V25 Pro provides a noticeable performance boost over the Dimensity 920 in the V23 5G. The V25 Pro's CPU configuration, with a higher-clocked Cortex-A78 core and more of them, contributes to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. Expect slightly faster app loading times and a more responsive user experience on the V25 Pro.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar between the two devices, with the V23 5G achieving a slightly higher endurance rating (103h vs 101h). However, the V25 Pro's 66W charging is considerably faster than the V23 5G's 44W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The vivo V23 5G is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly price point. The vivo V25 Pro is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, and faster charging speeds.