vivo V23 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its brighter display, more efficient chipset, and faster software updates. While the vivo V23 5G boasts a stylish design and fast charging, the A54's superior performance and longer software support make it the more compelling choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23 5G | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 19 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2130, V2303 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9) GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23 5G
- Stylish Design
- Fast 44W Charging
- Slim Profile
- Good Selfie Camera (likely)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Shorter Software Support
- Potentially Less Versatile Camera
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter Display
- More Efficient Chipset
- Longer Software Support
- Versatile Camera System
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Distinctive Design
- Can be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 980 nits significantly outshines the vivo V23 5G's 629 nits, making it much easier to view outdoors. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the A54's brightness advantage is undeniable. The A54 also likely has better color accuracy and calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A54 likely has a more versatile setup. While specific camera specs are not fully detailed, Samsung's image processing is generally considered superior, producing more natural-looking photos. The A54 also likely benefits from better low-light performance. The V23 5G's camera is still good, but the A54 is expected to be better overall.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the vivo V23 5G. The A54's 5nm process is more efficient, leading to better sustained performance and less heat generation. While both have octa-core CPUs, the A54's Cortex-A78 cores are slightly faster, and the overall architecture is more modern.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 demonstrates superior battery endurance. Its endurance rating of 119h is higher than the vivo V23 5G's 103h. While the V23 5G has faster wired charging (44W vs 25W), the A54's greater efficiency means it will likely last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo V23 5G is ideal for users prioritizing aesthetics, fast charging, and a slim design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a vibrant display, strong performance, and guaranteed software updates for years to come.