vivo V23 5G vs Oppo Reno8: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 edges out the vivo V23 5G thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and slightly better overall performance. While the V23 5G boasts a respectable endurance rating, the Reno8’s superior speed and processing power make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V23 5G | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 05 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 19 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation Up | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF 8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | V2130, V2303 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 103h | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.5 LUFS (Average) | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9) GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V23 5G
- Stylish Design
- Decent Camera
- Good Battery Life (Endurance Rating)
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Processor
- Average Performance
Oppo Reno8
- Fast Charging (80W)
- Powerful Processor (Dimensity 1300)
- Smooth Performance
- Slightly Better Camera
- Design may be less distinctive
- Reverse wired charging may not be a priority for all users
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Oppo Reno8 has a slightly higher peak brightness of 633 nits compared to the vivo V23 5G's 629 nits, resulting in marginally better outdoor visibility. Both offer a comfortable viewing experience for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno8 generally produces slightly more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in well-lit conditions. Low-light performance is comparable. Video recording quality is also similar on both devices, offering stable footage and decent dynamic range. Both phones feature a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the vivo V23 5G's Dimensity 920. The Reno8's CPU configuration, with a higher-clocked Cortex-A78 core and more of them, translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The V23 5G is still capable, but the Reno8 feels more responsive.
Battery Life
While both phones achieve impressive endurance ratings (103h and 105h respectively), the Oppo Reno8’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. It can charge from 0% to 50% in just 11 minutes and 100% in 28 minutes, a significant improvement over the vivo V23 5G's 44W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo V23 5G is a good choice for users prioritizing a stylish design and a decent camera experience on a budget. The Oppo Reno8 is ideal for those who value fast charging, smooth performance, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks and gaming.