vivo V20 vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and consistent performance, the vivo V20 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 720G, coupled with a measured 621 nits display brightness, offers a smoother, more efficient experience than the Oppo Reno 5G's Snapdragon 855, which may exhibit throttling under sustained load despite its raw power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V20 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 30. Released 2020, October 19 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.3 x 74.2 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 44 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Sunset Melody, Midnight Jazz, Moonlight Sonata | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | V2025, V2024 | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 880 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 111h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 276006(v8) GeekBench: 1686 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
vivo V20
- Excellent 111h battery life
- Faster 33W charging
- Brighter 621 nits display
- Less powerful chipset than the Reno 5G
- Camera details are lacking
Oppo Reno 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 855 processor
- Potentially better camera image processing
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 20W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The vivo V20 boasts a measured peak brightness of 621 nits, providing good visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. While the Oppo Reno 5G’s display specifications are not provided, the V20’s brightness advantage is notable. Both displays are advertised with an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term that doesn't provide specific technical insight. The V20’s brightness is a key differentiator, suggesting a more usable experience in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Reno series’ historical focus on camera technology, it’s reasonable to assume Oppo invested more in image processing and potentially a higher-quality main sensor. The V20 likely focuses on a balanced camera experience, while the Reno 5G may offer more advanced features and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of detail makes a definitive judgement impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7nm), a flagship-class processor from 2019. This offers significantly higher peak performance compared to the vivo V20’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm). However, the 855’s 7nm process, while advanced for its time, is less efficient than the 8nm process of the 720G. The Reno 5G’s CPU configuration – 1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485, and 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 – provides a performance edge, but the V20’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver configuration is optimized for efficiency. This translates to potentially longer sustained performance from the V20, avoiding the throttling that the 855 is known to experience under heavy load.
Battery Life
The vivo V20 achieves an impressive endurance rating of 111 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Oppo Reno 5G’s battery life isn’t specified, its 20W charging is slower than the V20’s 33W wired charging. This means the V20 will not only last longer on a single charge but also recharge faster. The Snapdragon 720G’s efficiency contributes significantly to the V20’s superior endurance, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V20 if you need a phone that consistently delivers all-day battery life and excels in everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and casual gaming. Its brighter display is also beneficial for outdoor use. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications or gaming, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and the risk of thermal throttling during extended use.