Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming. The vivo V20 SE offers a stylish design and decent features, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 boasts a reputation for excellent battery life and a vibrant display. Let's dive into a head-to-head comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, longer battery life, and generally better camera performance. While the V20 SE is more affordable, the A54 provides a more premium and future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 24. Released 2020, October 13 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls | - |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 contacts, Photo call | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 1.3 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML | - |
| Games | Yes | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email, Instant Messaging | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 62% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Oxygen Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | V2022, V2023 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| OUR TESTS |
|---|
| Battery | - | Active use score 11:15h |
| Battery (old) | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | 980 nits max brightness (measured) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V20 SE
- Slim and lightweight design
- Fast 33W charging
- Affordable price
- Decent front-facing camera
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially less durable build
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Powerful Exynos 1380 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Capable camera system
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Samsung's software support
- Slower 25W charging
- Higher price point
- Design may be considered less exciting by some
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown. Its 980 nits peak brightness is significantly higher than the V20 SE, offering better visibility in sunlight. The A54's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, while the V20 SE's display, though adequate, lacks the same punch and clarity. The A54 also likely has a higher resolution, contributing to sharper visuals.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Galaxy A54 generally delivers better image quality. Its camera system likely includes features like optical image stabilization (OIS) which the V20 SE may lack. The A54's processing algorithms are also likely more advanced, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos and videos. The V20 SE's camera is still good for everyday use, but the A54 offers a noticeable step up.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a clear winner here. Built on a 5nm process, it's significantly more efficient and powerful than the V20 SE's Snapdragon 665 (11nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A54. The A54's CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 cores) also contributes to its superior performance.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119h is exceptional, and the active use score of 11:15h is impressive. The V20 SE's battery life is decent, but falls short of the A54's longevity. The A54's more efficient chipset also contributes to its superior battery performance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the vivo V20 SE? Users on a tight budget who prioritize a slim design and fast charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Those seeking a reliable, long-lasting phone with a great display, capable camera, and a more powerful processor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo V20 SE good for gaming?
The V20 SE can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to its less powerful chipset.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A54 have a microSD card slot?
No, the Samsung Galaxy A54 does not have a microSD card slot for expandable storage.