The mid-range 5G market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo V19 and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent compelling options for users seeking connectivity without a flagship price tag. While both aim for similar demographics, they diverge in chipset choice and charging implementation, creating a clear distinction in performance and user experience. This comparison dives deep into these differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and 5G connectivity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 765G, built on a more efficient 7nm process, offers a noticeable performance uplift over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712, justifying the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | - | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 310 EUR | - |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
vivo V19
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Sleek and modern design (assumed)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Older Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Less efficient 10nm process
- Potentially lower 5G performance
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- 7nm process for better efficiency
- Integrated 5G modem for faster connectivity
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but differences exist. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processing power needed to drive the display. The Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW has a more capable ISP and GPU, potentially leading to smoother animations and better image processing for display output. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and both will likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications, a direct camera comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s superior ISP in the A71 5G UW provides a processing advantage. This translates to better image noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The A71 5G UW is likely to offer more sophisticated computational photography features. While both phones likely include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, the A71 5G UW’s processing power will deliver superior results. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, ultrawide, and depth sensor, but the A71 5G UW’s image signal processing will be the differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4GHz provides a substantial single-core performance advantage, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 7nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the A71 5G UW is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The A71 5G UW’s integrated 5G modem is also a key advantage, offering faster and more reliable 5G connectivity. The V19’s Snapdragon 712, while capable, will show its age in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The vivo V19’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage, achieving 54% charge in just 30 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s 25W charging. However, battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. The Snapdragon 765G’s 7nm efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the A71 5G UW, providing comparable real-world battery life despite the slower charging speed. The V19’s faster charging is ideal for quick top-ups, while the A71 5G UW may offer more consistent endurance throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you prioritize fast charging and a sleek design, and are willing to trade some raw processing power for a quicker top-up. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a rapid battery boost. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you value sustained performance for gaming and multitasking, and want the benefits of a more modern and efficient 5G chipset. This phone is better suited for power users and those heavily invested in 5G networks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G is a capable chipset for gaming. Its Adreno 620 GPU provides sufficient graphical power for smooth gameplay at medium to high settings in most popular titles. The 7nm process also helps prevent overheating and throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the V19’s Snapdragon 712.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the vivo V19 compared to the 25W charging on the A71 5G UW in real-world use?
The vivo V19’s 33W charging can add approximately 54% battery in 30 minutes, while the A71 5G UW’s 25W charging will take considerably longer to achieve a similar charge level. This means you can get a significant boost in battery life with a short charging session on the V19, making it ideal for users who frequently need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G modem in the A71 5G UW supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more stable data speeds. This is a crucial feature for maximizing the benefits of 5G networks, especially in areas with strong 5G coverage.
