The vivo V19 and Realme X50 Pro Player represent distinct approaches to the smartphone market. The V19, with its Snapdragon 712, aimed for a balance of features and affordability. The X50 Pro Player, powered by the flagship Snapdragon 865, targeted performance enthusiasts. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth daily performance and fast charging, the Realme X50 Pro Player is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 offers a substantial performance leap over the V19’s Snapdragon 712, and the 65W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the V19 is a capable device, the X50 Pro Player’s raw power justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, May 25. Released 2020, June 01 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Unspecified), glass back (Unspecified), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (standard), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Light Speed Silver, Phantom Black |
| Models | - | RMX2072 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V19
- More affordable price point
- Competent performance for everyday tasks
- 33W fast charging is still reasonably quick
- Significantly slower performance than the X50 Pro Player
- Less future-proof due to older chipset
- Likely lacks advanced display features
Realme X50 Pro Player
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 865
- Ultra-fast 65W SuperDart charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the X50 Pro Player's flagship positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (90Hz or 120Hz) compared to the V19, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. The X50 Pro Player likely benefits from a more advanced display calibration, offering greater color accuracy. The V19, being a more budget-conscious device, may prioritize power efficiency over display fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the X50 Pro Player, as a flagship, likely incorporates a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the 712’s, enabling features like faster autofocus, improved low-light performance, and higher-resolution video recording. While the V19 may offer a decent camera experience for casual users, the X50 Pro Player is expected to deliver superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a generational leap over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – a Cortex-A77 prime core versus the Kryo 360 Gold in the 712 – translating to significantly faster processing speeds (2.84 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The 7nm+ process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, allowing the X50 Pro Player to sustain peak performance for longer periods. This difference is particularly noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The X50 Pro Player’s Adreno 650 GPU also dwarfs the 712’s Adreno 618, providing a far superior graphics experience.
Battery Life
While battery capacities aren't specified, the charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Realme X50 Pro Player’s 65W SuperDart charging can fully charge the device in just 35 minutes, a substantial advantage over the vivo V19’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 54%. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day. The X50 Pro Player also supports PD (Power Delivery), offering wider compatibility with chargers and accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, and prioritize a more manageable price point. Buy the Realme X50 Pro Player if you demand top-tier performance for gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing with 5G connectivity, and are willing to invest in a faster charging experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 712 in the vivo V19 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 712 can run these games, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The X50 Pro Player’s Snapdragon 865 will handle these games at maximum settings with ease, offering a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 65W charging on the Realme X50 Pro Player compared to the 33W charging on the vivo V19 in real-world usage?
The X50 Pro Player can go from 0% to 100% in 35 minutes, while the V19 reaches 54% in 30 minutes. This means a much quicker top-up for the X50 Pro Player, especially useful for users who frequently need to recharge their phones during the day. The difference is particularly noticeable in the initial stages of charging.
❓ Does the Realme X50 Pro Player get noticeably hotter than the vivo V19 during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 865 is a more powerful chip and will generate more heat under load. While Realme likely implemented thermal management solutions, the X50 Pro Player may get warmer than the V19 during prolonged gaming. However, the improved thermal efficiency of the 7nm+ process node helps mitigate this.
