vivo V19 vs OnePlus 8T+ 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus 8T+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset provides a substantial leap in processing power and gaming capabilities compared to the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712. While the V19 offers a respectable experience, the 8T+’s faster charging and superior performance justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V19 | OnePlus 8T+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 25, 41, 66, 71 Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G 7.5 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, October 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, October 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 160.7 x 74.1 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | - |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 11, OxygenOS 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (market dependant) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 65W wired, 100% in 39 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Aquamarine Green, Lunar Silver |
| Models | - | KB2007 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 640 EUR |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V19
- Sleek and stylish design
- Balanced feature set
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Potentially limited software update support
OnePlus 8T+ 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 865 chipset
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Likely longer software support
- Higher price compared to the V19
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the specifics aren't provided. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G, being a more recent release, likely benefits from a higher refresh rate (120Hz is common for this chipset) for smoother scrolling and animations, a feature absent in the V19. The Snapdragon 865’s ISP also supports higher resolution video recording, potentially impacting display quality during video playback. Bezels are likely comparable, but the 8T+’s display tech is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) in the OnePlus 8T+ 5G offers superior image processing capabilities, including better dynamic range, noise reduction, and faster autofocus. The 865 also supports higher resolution video recording. While the V19 likely has a capable camera system, the 8T+’s ISP provides a distinct advantage in image quality and video performance. We can assume the 8T+ has a larger main sensor, given its positioning.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 865 features a more advanced CPU architecture – a Cortex-A77 prime core versus the Kryo 360 Gold in the V19 – resulting in faster single-core performance. The 865’s Adreno 650 GPU also delivers significantly higher graphics performance, making it ideal for gaming. The 7nm+ process node of the 865 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The V19 is adequate for everyday tasks, but the 8T+ excels in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The charging speeds are a key differentiator. The OnePlus 8T+ 5G’s 65W Warp Charge technology can fully charge the device in just 39 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo V19’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 54%. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the 8T+ mitigates any potential disadvantage in capacity. The 8T+’s more efficient chipset also contributes to better battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you prioritize a sleek design, balanced features, and are on a tighter budget, and don't require demanding gaming or heavy multitasking. Buy the OnePlus 8T+ 5G if you value raw performance, fast charging, and want a phone that can handle demanding applications and future software updates with ease. The 8T+ is the better choice for gamers and power users.