Motorola Edge 70 vs. vivo V19: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 70 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency compared to the V19’s Snapdragon 712, coupled with substantially faster 68W charging and impressive battery endurance. While the V19 remains a viable option, the Edge 70 offers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V19 | Motorola Edge 70 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2025, October 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, October 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 74 x 6 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.24 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM - International· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - China |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | 159 g (5.61 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM7750-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 722 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 16, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Pantone: Gadget Gray, Lily Pad, Bronze Green |
| Models | - | XT2601-2, XT2603-2 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | £ 799.00 |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 50:14h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class A |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
vivo V19
- Potentially lower price point (due to age)
- Reliable and proven platform
- 33W fast charging is adequate for casual users
- Older Snapdragon 712 chipset offers limited performance
- Less efficient 10nm process leads to more heat
- No wireless charging
Motorola Edge 70
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 chipset
- 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Exceptional battery endurance (50:14h)
- Long-lasting battery (1000 cycles)
- Potentially higher price point
- May require software updates to optimize performance
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics for both devices. However, given the V19’s release date, it likely features an older AMOLED panel. The Edge 70, being newer, likely benefits from advancements in panel technology, potentially including higher peak brightness and improved color accuracy. The Edge 70’s newer manufacturing process likely allows for thinner bezels, contributing to a more immersive viewing experience. Without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to definitively state which display is superior, but the Edge 70 has a clear advantage due to its newer technology.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Edge 70’s newer chipset likely incorporates a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), enabling improved image processing capabilities. While sensor size and lens aperture are crucial, the ISP plays a significant role in noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. The V19’s older chipset may struggle to keep up with the Edge 70 in challenging lighting conditions. We can assume the Edge 70 will deliver more consistent and detailed photos, especially in low light.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 70’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 (4nm) represents a substantial leap forward in performance and efficiency compared to the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 4nm process node allows for greater transistor density and reduced power consumption, translating to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Edge 70’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-720 prime core alongside 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-720 cores and 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-520 cores – is architecturally more advanced than the V19’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver setup. This means the Edge 70 will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications with greater ease and responsiveness. Users who frequently game or edit videos will particularly benefit from the Edge 70’s superior processing power.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 70 boasts a significant advantage in battery technology. While the exact mAh capacity isn’t provided, its reported 50:14h endurance and 13:36h active use score demonstrate exceptional battery life. Crucially, the 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the V19’s 33W charging. The Edge 70 also includes 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the V19. The Edge 70’s battery is also rated for 1000 cycles, suggesting long-term reliability. Users who prioritize all-day battery life and quick charging will find the Edge 70 far more appealing.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you prioritize a proven, reliable experience and are on a very tight budget. It's a solid choice for basic smartphone tasks and light usage. Buy the Motorola Edge 70 if you value performance, fast charging, and longer battery life, especially if you enjoy mobile gaming or frequently use demanding applications. The Edge 70 is the better investment for users who want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come.