vivo V19 vs Huawei P40 lite 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Huawei P40 lite 5G is the stronger choice. Its Kirin 820 5G, built on a 7nm process, offers a noticeable efficiency advantage over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712, translating to better multitasking and potentially longer gaming sessions. However, the V19 remains a viable option for those seeking a reliable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V19 | Huawei P40 lite 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, May 15. Released 2020, May 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 75 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Kirin 820 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Mali-G57 (6-core) |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Crush Green, Space Silver, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | CDY-NX9A |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V19
- Familiar Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset
- Reliable and stable software experience (typically)
- Competitive price point
- Less efficient 10nm chipset
- Slower charging speeds (33W)
- Potentially lower peak performance
Huawei P40 lite 5G
- More efficient 7nm Kirin 820 5G chipset
- Faster 40W wired charging with 70% in 30 minutes
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Huawei’s EMUI software may not appeal to all users
- Potential concerns regarding Google Mobile Services (depending on region/version)
- Long-term software support uncertainty
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics, but given the market positioning, both likely feature LCD panels. The P40 lite 5G’s slightly higher price point *may* indicate a marginally better panel, but without nit brightness or color gamut data, it’s speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, aiming for a modern, immersive experience. The absence of high refresh rate support on either device is typical for this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the P40 lite 5G’s positioning suggests a potentially more advanced image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Kirin 820. This could result in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It’s reasonable to assume both phones include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the P40 lite 5G likely benefits from Huawei’s established camera algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Huawei P40 lite 5G’s Kirin 820 5G, fabricated on a 7nm process, demonstrably outperforms the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The Kirin 820’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a more robust architecture than the Snapdragon 712’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use. While both are octa-core, the Kirin 820’s architecture is more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The P40 lite 5G’s 40W wired charging significantly surpasses the V19’s 33W charging. Huawei claims 70% charge in 30 minutes, while vivo states 54% in the same timeframe. This faster charging is a substantial advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While mAh capacity isn’t provided, the Kirin 820’s superior efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The P40 lite 5G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the V19.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you prioritize a familiar Qualcomm ecosystem and a generally stable software experience, and are less demanding in terms of intensive gaming or prolonged multitasking. Buy the Huawei P40 lite 5G if you value faster charging speeds, a more modern and efficient chipset for smoother performance, and are comfortable with Huawei’s EMUI software.