vivo V19 vs. Google Pixel 4a 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and camera quality, the Google Pixel 4a 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 765G chipset offers a performance edge and future-proof 5G support, while Google’s image processing consistently delivers excellent results. However, the vivo V19’s faster charging is a significant advantage for those constantly on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo V19 | Google Pixel 4a 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6, mmWave (market dependant) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 06. Released 2020, April 29 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, November 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.28 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 153.9 x 74 x 8.2 mm (Sub-6) or 8.5 mm (Sub-6 and mmWave) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186.5 g (6.60 oz) | 168 g (5G Sub-6); 171 g ( 5G Sub-6 and mmWave) (5.93 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.7 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, HDR10, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 360 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 360 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 616 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 107˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.1, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 3885 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mystic Silver/Sleek Silver, Piano Black/Gleam Black | Just Black, Clearly White |
| Models | - | GD1YQ, G025I, G025E, G025H, G6QU3 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | 1.14 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo V19
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Sleek and stylish design (assumed based on brand reputation)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Older Snapdragon 712 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Inferior image processing compared to Pixel
Google Pixel 4a 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G chipset
- 5G connectivity for future-proof performance
- Superior camera quality thanks to Google’s software
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially higher price
- May lack the design flair of the vivo V19
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs. LCD) aren't provided, the focus here is on processing power. The display quality will likely be similar, but the Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 4a 5G has a more capable ISP which could translate to better image processing for photos taken on the display. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
While megapixel counts aren't the sole determinant of camera quality, the Pixel 4a 5G benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms. The Snapdragon 765G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced than the 712’s, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and detail preservation. The Pixel’s software excels in low-light conditions, consistently producing impressive results. While the V19 likely offers a decent camera experience, it won’t match the Pixel’s image processing prowess. The absence of details regarding sensor sizes makes a direct comparison difficult, but Google’s software advantage is a key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 4a 5G’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) represents a significant leap over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 712 (10nm). The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the 765G can deliver more performance with less heat. The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core (2.4 GHz) also offers a performance advantage over the V19’s Kryo 360 Gold cores (2.3 GHz). This translates to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pixel 4a 5G. The 765G also integrates a 5G modem, providing future-proof connectivity, while the V19 lacks 5G support.
Battery Life
The vivo V19’s 33W wired charging is a clear win. It can achieve 54% charge in just 30 minutes, significantly faster than the Pixel 4a 5G’s 18W charging with PD2.0. While the Pixel 4a 5G supports Power Delivery, it’s considerably slower. This means the V19 is more forgiving if you frequently forget to charge overnight. However, battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, so it’s difficult to assess overall battery life. The more efficient Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 4a 5G might offset the slower charging to some extent, but the V19’s charging speed is a substantial advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 if you need exceptionally fast charging and a design-focused experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost and appreciate a more polished aesthetic. Buy the Google Pixel 4a 5G if you prioritize a clean Android experience, superior camera performance, and 5G connectivity for the long term. It’s the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those seeking a smooth, software-driven experience.