Both the vivo V19 (Indonesia variant) and the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW represent attempts to deliver 5G connectivity and a modern smartphone experience at a relatively accessible price point. However, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on real-world implications for performance, battery life, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G offers a significant performance uplift over the V19’s Snapdragon 675, justifying the potential price difference. However, the V19 remains a viable option for users on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 SA/NSA/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 10. Released 2020, March 26 | 2020, July 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, July 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, One UI 2.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/240fps, 1080p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Crystal White | Prism Bricks Black |
| Models | - | SM-A716V |
| Price | About 270 EUR | - |
| SAR | - | 0.50 W/kg (head) 0.78 W/kg (body) |
vivo V19 (Indonesia)
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Reliable brand reputation
- Significantly weaker performance compared to A71 5G UW
- Slower charging speed
- Less future-proof chipset
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 765G
- Faster 25W wired charging
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially higher price
- Larger size and weight
- Samsung’s software bloat (subjective)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable for the V19, the A71 5G UW’s display is likely a standard Super AMOLED panel. The key difference lies in processing power impacting UI smoothness. The Snapdragon 765G in the A71 5G UW will contribute to a more fluid scrolling experience and faster app loading times, indirectly enhancing the perceived display quality. Bezels are comparable, typical of this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information for the V19, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely employ multi-camera setups focused on versatility. The A71 5G UW benefits from the superior image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 765G, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. While both may include standard wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, the A71 5G UW’s processing capabilities will likely result in more detailed and dynamic images. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A71 5G UW, if equipped, would further enhance image quality, particularly in video recording.
Performance
The core differentiator is the chipset. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo V19’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The 7nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved thermal efficiency, meaning the A71 5G UW can sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling. The CPU architecture also favors the A71 5G UW; its Kryo 475 Prime core at 2.4GHz provides a noticeable boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 675’s Kryo 460 Gold cores at 2.0GHz are adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with more demanding workloads. The A71 5G UW’s Adreno 620 GPU also significantly outperforms the 675’s Adreno 618, making it the better choice for mobile gaming.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW’s 25W wired charging is a clear advantage over the vivo V19’s 18W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified for the V19, the A71 5G UW’s battery size, combined with the more efficient Snapdragon 765G, should provide comparable, if not slightly better, real-world battery life despite the faster charging. The 7nm process node of the 765G contributes to lower power consumption during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 (Indonesia) if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications, and value 5G connectivity for faster data speeds and potential future network compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V19 struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 675 is likely to struggle with PUBG Mobile at higher settings. You’ll likely need to reduce graphics settings and frame rates to achieve a playable experience, and even then, expect occasional stuttering. The A71 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW compared to the vivo V19’s 18W charging?
The 25W charging on the A71 5G UW can realistically shave off 30-60 minutes of charging time compared to the V19, depending on battery level. Expect a full charge in around 1.5-2 hours on the A71 5G UW, versus potentially over 2.5 hours on the V19.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G supports carrier aggregation, allowing it to combine multiple 5G channels for faster and more reliable data speeds, provided your carrier supports it. This is a significant advantage over devices with limited 5G capabilities.
