Both the vivo V19 (Indonesia variant) and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW represent attempts to deliver 5G connectivity and a modern smartphone experience at a relatively accessible price point. However, they take different approaches, particularly in their core processing power. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact real-world performance and user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and 5G capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 765G offers a significant performance uplift over the V19’s Snapdragon 675, justifying the slight price premium. However, the V19 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 2, 4, 5, 13, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 10. Released 2020, March 26 | 2020, August 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, August 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.6 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 188.8 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, One UI 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | ANT+ |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 672 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Crystal White | Prism Bricks Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A516V |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 470 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.70 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.32 W/kg (body) |
vivo V19 (Indonesia)
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker Snapdragon 675 processor
- Less capable GPU for gaming
- Potentially lower image quality due to ISP limitations
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW
- More powerful Snapdragon 765G processor
- Superior GPU performance for gaming
- Advanced ISP for better image processing
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potentially higher price
- May experience some throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the processing power driving the UI. The A51 5G UW’s more powerful chipset will contribute to smoother animations and faster app loading times, enhancing the perceived visual experience even on a similar-quality panel. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor specifications beyond the presence of cameras, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 765G’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the 675’s, offering improved image processing capabilities. This translates to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The A51 5G UW is likely to produce more detailed and vibrant photos. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; the primary sensor quality is the key differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW’s Snapdragon 765G, fabricated on a 7nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the vivo V19’s 11nm Snapdragon 675. The 765G’s Kryo 475 Prime core (2.4 GHz) provides a significant single-core performance boost, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 765G also features a more capable Adreno 620 GPU, translating to better gaming performance. The Snapdragon 675, while adequate for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and multitasking. The 7nm process also implies better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo V19 charges at 18W, while the A51 5G UW manages with 15W. While the V19 has a faster charging speed, the Snapdragon 765G’s improved efficiency could offset this advantage. The A51 5G UW’s chipset is more power-efficient, potentially leading to comparable or even better real-world battery life despite a potentially similar battery capacity (data unavailable). The 15W charging on the A51 5G UW will still provide a reasonable 0-100% charge time, likely within 2-3 hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 (Indonesia) if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and want the benefits of 5G connectivity for faster download speeds and lower latency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 765G in the A51 5G UW handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 765G’s Adreno 620 GPU is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won’t match flagship performance, it provides a significantly better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 675.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G UW experience significant overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 765G is generally efficient, but some throttling is possible during extended gaming. The A51 5G UW’s thermal design is adequate for moderate use, but prolonged, high-intensity gaming may lead to a slight decrease in performance to manage heat.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the A51 5G UW noticeably slower than the 18W charging on the vivo V19?
While 18W is faster on paper, the difference in real-world charging times may not be drastic. The A51 5G UW’s more efficient chipset could partially offset the slower charging speed, resulting in comparable overall usage time.
