The vivo V19 (Indonesia) and Oppo Reno3 Pro represent a fascinating crossroads in the mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aimed to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they took different approaches to achieve this. The V19 prioritized a balanced feature set with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 675, while the Reno3 Pro leaned on MediaTek’s Helio P95 and a focus on fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a reliable experience, the Oppo Reno3 Pro emerges as the better choice. Its Helio P95 chipset, while not a massive leap, offers a slight edge in CPU performance, and the 30W fast charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the V19’s 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Version 1 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Version 1 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Version 3 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, March 10. Released 2020, March 26 | 2020, March 02. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) | 158.8 x 73.4 x 8.1 mm (6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 101.8 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.0 | Android 10, ColorOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 44 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.65", 0.7µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 20 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4025 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic Blue, Crystal White | Auroral Blue, Midnight Black, Sky White |
| Models | - | CPH2035, CPH2037, CPH2036 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 540 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 165224 (v7), 227810 (v8)
GeekBench: 7028 (v4.4), 1517 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.4fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo V19 (Indonesia)
- Reliable Snapdragon 675 performance
- Balanced feature set
- Potentially more stable software experience
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful CPU compared to Reno3 Pro
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Reno3 Pro
- Faster 30W charging (50% in 20 min)
- More powerful Helio P95 CPU
- Potentially better camera image processing
- MediaTek chipset may have more aggressive background app management
- ColorOS can be feature-rich but also bloated
- Limited camera details available
Display Comparison
Both the vivo V19 and Oppo Reno3 Pro boast displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating deep blacks. However, detailed display specifications like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Reno3 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a slightly more vibrant panel. The lack of high refresh rate support on either device is a notable omission compared to some competitors, but typical for this price bracket. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective form factors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Oppo historically emphasizes camera features, suggesting the Reno3 Pro likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). The Reno3 Pro’s image processing may prioritize vibrant colors, while the V19 might lean towards a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno3 Pro’s MediaTek Helio P95 (12nm) features a dual-cluster configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a theoretical performance advantage over the vivo V19’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (11nm) with its 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the P95’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a more substantial boost in single-core performance, impacting app launch speeds and responsiveness. The 12nm process node of the P95 is slightly less efficient than the 675’s 11nm, potentially leading to slightly higher power consumption under sustained load. However, the difference is unlikely to be dramatic in real-world usage.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are vastly different. The Oppo Reno3 Pro’s 30W wired charging can deliver a 50% charge in just 20 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo V19’s slower 18W charging. This faster charging is crucial for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. While the V19 might offer slightly longer screen-on time due to the less powerful chipset, the Reno3 Pro’s charging speed mitigates the impact of any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo V19 (Indonesia) if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on software stability and a generally well-rounded experience. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily tax their phones with demanding games or intensive multitasking. Buy the Oppo Reno3 Pro if you prefer faster charging speeds, a slightly more powerful processor for smoother app switching and light gaming, and are willing to potentially manage slightly more aggressive background app management typical of ColorOS.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio P95 in the Oppo Reno3 Pro overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Helio P95 is a capable chipset, it's not known for exceptional thermal efficiency. Expect some throttling during extended gaming, but it shouldn't be severe enough to render games unplayable. The Reno3 Pro's cooling system is likely adequate for moderate gaming, but hardcore gamers might experience some performance dips.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo V19 slow compared to modern standards?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. It will take significantly longer to fully charge the V19 compared to the Reno3 Pro's 30W charging. Expect a full charge to take well over 2 hours, making it less convenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ How does the software experience differ between vivo's Funtouch OS and Oppo's ColorOS?
Funtouch OS is generally considered to be more minimalist and closer to stock Android, while ColorOS is more feature-rich and customizable. ColorOS often includes more pre-installed apps and can be more aggressive with battery optimization, potentially impacting background app performance. Both have improved significantly over time, but ColorOS tends to be more visually distinct.
